One place for my work as an engineer and my work at the university: calculators on one side, course notes, files and my TA pages on the other.
11 calculators for gears, shafts, fits, beams, sheet metal, machining and dynamics. Every result updates a live drawing, and every formula names its source.
Study notes by topic, every course file of the Production & Design department grouped by type, links to the other departments, and my TA pages.
Change any input and the results and the drawing update together. Units are SI (mm, N, MPa) throughout. Each tool lists the references its formulas come from; typical values are marked as starting points to check, not design values.
Standard full-depth involute teeth. Enter the module and tooth counts to get the geometry of both gears, the centre distance and the output torque.
Flat blank length for a single bend, from outside flange dimensions measured to the virtual sharp.
Spindle speed, feed rate and metal removal rate from the cutting speed you choose. Take Vc from your tool maker's data or a handbook table.
Torque from power and speed, then the minimum solid-shaft diameter in pure torsion at an allowable shear stress.
Limits of size, tolerances, clearance or interference and fit type from the hole and shaft deviations. Enter the deviations from the ISO 286 tables.
Torque from power and speed, then shear stress and angle of twist for a solid or hollow circular shaft.
Simply supported beam with a central point load: reactions, maximum moment, bending stress and deflection.
Elongation, stress and strain of a bar under axial load, plus free or fully restrained thermal expansion.
Area, centroid, second moments of area, section modulus and radius of gyration for standard shapes.
Range, maximum height, flight time and landing speed for a launch from any height, gravity only.
Enter a value once and read it in every unit of the same quantity.
Mechanical Design & Production Engineering department. Notes I wrote from the course material, the course files themselves, my TA pages, and quick links to the other departments.
Drawing, stress, testing, section tables, dynamics, machine design, metal cutting and vibration, each with its own index.
Open notes →Every subject of the Production & Design path, files grouped into lectures, sheets, exams, notes, books, videos and images.
Browse files →The subjects I teach, my notes for each one, and my weekly sections timetable.
Open TA desk →Drive folders of Civil, Electrical, Communication, CSE and Mechanical Power, by year.
Open links →From the ZigZag (IEEE-ZSB) Drive folders. Prep and First year are the shared years before the department; Second to Fourth year are Production & Design. Weekly newsletters and daily-reading folders are left out.
Add the subjects you teach, keep notes for each one, and fill in your sections timetable. Everything here is saved in this browser only.
| Day | Time | Subject | Group | Room |
|---|
Links out to each department's Drive folder, by year. Their files are not copied into this site.
Notes pulled from the Prep, 1st-year Mechanical and 2nd-year Production course material. Pick a topic to open its index; every section names the document it came from, and points that need checking are flagged.
Lines, projection, sections, fits, GD&T, surface texture, welding, keys, gears, fasteners and assembly drawings.
Open index →Equilibrium, internal loads, stress and strain, axial members, torsion, bending, yield criteria and plasticity.
Open index →Tension, compression, bending, shear and torsion, hardness, impact and fatigue, with the course formulas.
Open index →Centroids, area and mass moments of inertia for the standard shapes and solids.
Open index →Particle motion, projectiles, polar coordinates, impact, rigid-body kinematics, the instantaneous centre, F = ma, work and energy.
Open index →Belts and chains, gears (geometry, forces, Lewis and AGMA), clutches and brakes, rolling bearings, fatigue factors, stress concentration, and solved past exams.
Open index →Chip formation, tool geometry, cutting forces and power, turning, drilling and milling, temperature, tool wear and Taylor tool life, exam questions.
Open index →Definitions, free and forced single-degree systems, unbalance, isolation, instruments, two-degree systems, absorbers, sheets and exam questions.
Open index →[S1] Drawing book Part 1, §3.2
[S1] §2.3–2.4, §2.2-7
Dimensions on a drawing are always the real size, whatever the scale.
Enlarged 2:1, 2.5:1, 5:1, 10:1, 20:1 … 1000:1 · Full 1:1 · Reduced 1:2, 1:2.5, 1:5, 1:10, 1:20 … 1:1000.
Pencils: 7H–9H extremely hard → H medium hard → HB medium soft → B soft → 5B–7B extremely soft. Hard leads for thin lines, soft leads for thick continuous lines.
| Sheet | Size a × b (mm) | Uncut | Drawing area |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0 | 841 × 1189 | 880 × 1230 | 820 × 1169 |
| A1 | 594 × 841 | 625 × 880 | 574 × 820 |
| A2 | 420 × 594 | 450 × 625 | 400 × 574 |
| A3 | 297 × 420 | 330 × 450 | 270 × 400 |
| A4 | 210 × 297 | 240 × 330 | 200 × 270 |
| A5 | 148 × 210 | 165 × 240 | 138 × 200 |
Table from [S1] §2.3 (a1×b1, a2×b2, a3×b3 columns).
[S1] §3.4
[S1] ch.5 §5.3
Three planes: V gives the front view (elevation), H the plan, W the side view. Use at least two views, three for complex parts. The front view is the face that shows the most.
Plan widths come from the front view; side-view heights come from the front view.
The views are identical in both systems; only their positions change.
[S2] Part 2, ch.1
[S2] ch.4
[S5] fits summary · checked against ISO 286-2
Capital letter = hole, small letter = shaft: ⌀25 H8/f6. Table values are in µm; divide by 1000 for mm.
Hole-basis system: hole H, lower deviation 0. Shaft-basis: shaft h, upper deviation 0.
Fit type from the shaft letter (hole-basis) [S5]: a…h clearance · j, k, m, n transition · p, r, s, t, u, z interference.
Worked example from [S5], ⌀25 H8/f6: hole 25.000–25.033, shaft 24.967–24.980 → max clearance 0.066, min clearance 0.020 mm.
[S6] machining marks & geometrical tolerances
Used to control a feature's form, make sure it sits in the right place for its function, keep parts interchangeable, and make mating parts easy to assemble.
| Group | Characteristic | Datum? | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Form | ⏤ | Straightness | No |
| ⏥ | Flatness | No | |
| ○ | Circularity | No | |
| ⌭ | Cylindricity | No | |
| Profile | ⌒ | Profile of a line | Either |
| ⌓ | Profile of a surface | Either | |
| Orientation | ∠ | Angularity | Yes |
| ⟂ | Perpendicularity | Yes | |
| ∥ | Parallelism | Yes | |
| Location | ⌖ | Position | Yes |
| ◎ | Concentricity | Yes | |
| ⌯ | Symmetry | Yes | |
| Runout | ↗ | Circular runout | Yes |
| ⌰ | Total runout | Yes |
[S10] notebook ch.7 §7-4 · [S6] Fig 7.14
The symbol [S10 pp.138–143]: a check mark with legs at 60° whose point touches the surface, an extension line or a leader; the long leg is on the right as the drawing is read.
Machining marks on drawings carry the value, e.g. reaming 2.5/0.32, grinding 2.5/0.160, drilling Rz80 [S6].
Expected Ra for each process: see Roughness by process.
[S10] notebook Fig 7.14, p.141
Expected Ra for each production method. Usual is the solid bar in the chart ("average application"); range includes the hatched ends ("less frequent application").
| Process | Usual Ra, µm | Range, µm |
|---|---|---|
| Machining | ||
| Flame cutting | 25 – 12.5 | 50 – 6.3 |
| Sawing | 25 – 1.6 | 50 – 0.8 |
| Planing, shaping | 12.5 – 1.6 | 25 – 0.4 |
| Drilling | 6.3 – 1.6 | 12.5 – 0.8 |
| Electric discharge machining | ≈5 – 1.6 | 12.5 – 0.8 |
| Milling | 6.3 – 0.8 | 25 – 0.2 |
| Broaching | 3.2 – 0.8 | 6.3 – 0.4 |
| Reaming | 3.2 – 0.8 | 6.3 – 0.4 |
| Boring, turning | 6.3 – 0.4 | 25 – 0.05 |
| Grinding | 1.6 – 0.1 | 6.3 – 0.025 |
| Honing | 0.8 – 0.1 | 1.6 – 0.025 |
| Polishing | 0.4 – 0.1 | 0.8 – 0.012 |
| Lapping | 0.4 – 0.05 | 0.8 – 0.012 |
| Superfinishing | 0.2 – 0.05 | 0.8 – 0.012 |
| Natural finishes | ||
| Sand casting | 25 – 12.5 | 50 – 6.3 |
| Hot rolling | 25 – 12.5 | 50 – 6.3 |
| Forging | 12.5 – 3.2 | 25 – 1.6 |
| Permanent-mould casting | 3.2 – 1.6 | 6.3 – 0.8 |
| Extruding | 3.2 – 0.8 | 12.5 – 0.4 |
| Cold rolling, drawing | 3.2 – 0.8 | 6.3 – 0.2 |
| Die casting | 1.6 – 0.8 | 3.2 – 0.4 |
[S7] welding summary · [S10] §7-3-4
t = 0.707 h.[S3] keys handout · [S10] notebook §5.1–5.11, §4.6
w = d/4, t = 2w/3 = d/6; square w = t = d/4; gib-head same, with a head to drive it out.D 6 × 28 × 34 × S2X = centred on D, 6 splines, minor ⌀28, major ⌀34.[S10] notebook ch.9 (pp.165–197)
r = 0.4m (spur, helical), 0.2m (bevel).m = De/(z+2), rounded up to the standard value. Bevel: m = De/(z + 2cos δ), tan δ = z1/z2.mn = m cos ψ; bevel pitch angle tan γ = Np/NG; worm lead L = px·Nw, tan λ = L/(π dw).Fa = F cos φn sin ψ; the printed form repeats the tangential force Ft.[S10] notebook §5-5, 5-6 · [S8] fasteners sheet
DOUBLE-END STUD M10 × 1.5 × 100, STEEL, CADMIUM PLATED.l₂ = l₁ + 0.5d; tap; screw the stud home.M6 × 1 × 40 HEX CAP SCREW.M10 × 1.5 × 40 SLOTTED FLAT HEAD MACHINE SCREW.[S4] riveted joints handout
p ≈ 3d · margin m ≈ 1.5d · row pitch 0.8p (chain) or 0.6p (zig-zag).t₁ = 1.125 t; double straps t₂ = 0.75 t each. Stronger than lap joints.d = 6√t (t in mm). Confirm against the notebook before using it.[S10] notebook ch.6–7
Assembly drawing: shows how parts fit in their working positions. Types: general, detailed, working, sub-assembly, installation, outline, diagram, exploded.
Working drawing: everything needed to make the part: shape, sizes, notes (material, finish, geometric tolerances, heat treatment) and title block.
[M7] Hibbeler Statics · [M1] Stress Analysis §1.2
M = F·d (d ⟂ distance), vector form M = r × F.½wL at L/3 from the large end.Other statics topics in the course: 3D force systems, moment about a line, equivalent systems, friction, centroids and Pappus, moments of inertia, trusses (joints, sections, space), frames and machines, virtual work, potential energy.
[M1] §1.3–1.4 · [M8] structure lectures
N, V and M diagrams come from writing N(x), V(x), M(x) for each loading segment [M1 Ex. 1.3].
[M1] §1.6–1.7 · [M6]
Stress is internal force per unit area at a point, always on a named plane. Unit: Pa = N/m² (1 MPa = 1 N/mm²). A stress needs a magnitude, a direction and the plane it acts on.
[M1] ch.2 · [M2] · [M4] · [M6]
G = E / [2(1 + ν)] (standard relation).[M2] axial loading lecture (2P, Flexibility & plasticity)
α ΔT L = δ_gap + R L / (E A).[M3] Beer & Johnston ch.3
γ = ρφ / L.T_Y = (π/2) c³ τ_Y. With an elastic core of radius ρ_Y: T = (4/3) T_Y [1 − ¼ (ρ_Y/c)³]. Fully plastic T_P = (4/3) T_Y.[M3] Beer & Johnston ch.4
M_Y = σ_Y I / c; with elastic core half-thickness y_Y: M = (3/2) M_Y [1 − ⅓ (y_Y/c)²]; plastic moment M_P = (3/2) M_Y.[M5] Mendelson, Plasticity, ch.6 · course: 2P Flexibility & plasticity
Principal stresses σ₁ ≥ σ₂ ≥ σ₃; σ_Y = yield stress in simple tension.
For ductile metals Tresca and von Mises agree best with tests; Tresca is always the more conservative of the two.
[M4] plasticity chapter (Dr. M. Agwa)
[M4] plasticity chapter · [M6] tension laws · [M9] testing lectures
L0 = 5 d0 (round) or 5.65 √A0; long L0 = 10 d0 or 11.3 √A0. L0 is the gauge length, not the specimen length.[M15] compression notes · 1st-year Mechanical, Material
θ = 45° + φ/2 ≈ 55–60° (φ = angle of internal friction), with no yield point.2 ≤ L/D ≤ 10. Below 2 the end friction dominates; above 10 the specimen buckles. A spherical seating block corrects ends that are not parallel.[M14] bending test notes · 1st-year Mechanical, Material
σ_PL = M_PL y / I; modulus of rupture σ_max = M_max y / I. Take P and δ for E from the elastic range only.R = D if D ≤ 25 mm, R = 1.5 D if D > 25 mm. Inspect for cracks on the outer fibres (tension), inner fibres (compression), 45° shear cracks, and random cracks from defects. Other variants: hot bend, nick-bend, quench-bend.[M13] shear & torsion notes + ZigZag "Shear _ Torsion tests" summary
Direct shear (force parallel to the section):
Torsion test: record T against the angle of twist θ, then:
R = ½ T_PL θ_PL; toughness ≈ ⅔ T_max θ_max; moduli = value ÷ (A0 L0).Lf = √(L0² + (r θ_max)²), % elongation = (Lf − L0)/L0 × 100.E ≈ 2.5 G (from G = E / 2(1 + ν)). Design stress τ = τ_PL / FoS, FoS 1.5–3.[M10] hardness notes · 1st-year Mechanical, Material · [M17] Callister
Brinell: hardened-steel ball D = 1, 2, 5 or 10 mm, load P (kg) held 15–20 s, measure the impression diameter d.
| Material | K = P/D² | P with D = 10 mm |
|---|---|---|
| Steel (hard metals) | 30 | 3000 kg |
| Copper and Al alloys (intermediate) | 15 | 1500 kg |
| Aluminium (soft) | 5 | 500 kg |
Vickers: diamond square-based pyramid, 136° between opposite faces, loads 10–120 kg. The number does not change with load for the same material, which makes it suitable for very hard materials and thin sheet.
| Rockwell | Indenter | Major load | Used for |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | diamond cone (Brale) | 60 kg | hardened steel, very hard metals, small impressions |
| B | steel ball 1/16 in (1.588 mm) | 100 kg | mild and medium-carbon steel sheet |
| C | diamond cone (Brale) | 150 kg | alloy steel, anything harder than B100 |
[M11] impact test notes · 1st-year Mechanical, Material
A load applied suddenly causes more stress than the same load applied slowly. Weight P dropped from height h onto a bar of length L and area A:
Weight dropped at mid-span of a simply supported beam:
U = W H − W H′ (pendulum weight × drop in height). The notch makes sure the specimen breaks: without it a ductile bar only bends. Both strikes put the notch on the tension side.Kt = σ_notch / σ_applied = 1 + 2√(D/ρ), D = notch depth, ρ = notch radius. Semicircular notch (D = ρ) → Kt = 3.[M12] fatigue theory notes + problems · 1st-year Mechanical, Material
| Rule | Failure line | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Goodman | Sa/Se + Sm/Sut = 1 | straight line Se → Sut |
| Soderberg | Sa/Se + Sm/Sy = 1 | most conservative, ends at yield |
| Gerber | Sa/Se + (Sm/Sut)² = 1 | parabola, least conservative |
| Modified Goodman | Goodman ∩ Sa + Sm = Sy | Goodman line cut by the yield line |
[M16] Hibbeler table "Geometric properties of line and area elements" + ZigZag summary
| Shape | Area | Centroid | Moment of inertia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rectangle b × h | bh | centre | Ix̄ = bh³/12 · Iȳ = hb³/12 base: bh³/3 |
| Triangle b, h | ½bh | h/3 from the base | Ix̄ = bh³/36 base: bh³/12 |
| Circle r | πr² | centre | I = πr⁴/4 · J = πr⁴/2 |
| Semicircle r | πr²/2 | 4r/3π from the diameter | diameter: πr⁴/8 centroidal: πr⁴/8 − 8r⁴/9π |
| Quarter circle r | πr²/4 | 4r/3π from each edge | each edge: πr⁴/16 |
| Sector, half-angle θ | θr² | ⅔ r sinθ/θ from the centre | Ix = ¼r⁴(θ − ½sin2θ) Iy = ¼r⁴(θ + ½sin2θ) |
| Trapezoid a (top), b, h | ½h(a + b) | h(2a + b) / 3(a + b) from b | — |
| Semiparabolic area | ⅔ab | 3b/8, 3a/5 | — |
| Exparabolic (spandrel) | ⅓ab | 3a/4, 3b/10 | — |
| Parabolic area | 4/3 ab | 2a/5 from the straight edge | — |
| Arc, half-angle θ | L = 2θr | r sinθ/θ from the centre | — |
| Quarter / semicircle arc | πr/2 · πr | 2r/π | — |
[M16] Hibbeler table "Center of gravity and mass moment of inertia of homogeneous solids" + ZigZag summary
| Solid | About axes through G | Where G is |
|---|---|---|
| Sphere r (V = 4/3 πr³) | Ixx = Iyy = Izz = 2/5 mr² | centre |
| Hemisphere r (V = 2/3 πr³) | Ixx = Iyy = 0.259 mr² · Izz = 2/5 mr² | 3r/8 from the flat face |
| Cylinder r, h (V = πr²h) | Ixx = Iyy = 1/12 m(3r² + h²) · Izz = ½ mr² | mid-height |
| Cone r, h (V = ⅓ πr²h) | Ixx = Iyy = 3/80 m(4r² + h²) · Izz = 3/10 mr² | h/4 from the base |
| Thin circular disk r | Ixx = Iyy = ¼ mr² · Izz = ½ mr² · Iz′z′ = 3/2 mr² | centre (z′ ∥ z through the rim) |
| Thin ring r | Ixx = Iyy = ½ mr² · Izz = mr² | centre |
| Thin plate a × b | Ixx = 1/12 mb² · Iyy = 1/12 ma² · Izz = 1/12 m(a² + b²) | centre |
| Slender rod l | Ixx = Iyy = 1/12 ml² · about an end = ⅓ ml² | mid-length |
[D3-a] "Straight line motion (2): graphical solutions" · [D1-1] pp.2–3
[D3-b] "Curvilinear motion: projectile" · Prep, 2nd term
Gravity is the only force: ax = 0, ay = −g (−9.81 m/s², −32.2 ft/s²) with y upward.
[D3-c] "Polar coordinates" and its summary table, p.6
| Axes | Velocity | Acceleration |
|---|---|---|
| Cartesian x, y | Vx = ẋ, Vy = ẏ | ax = ẍ, ay = ÿ |
| Normal–tangential | Vt = V, Vn = 0 | at, an = V²/ρ |
| Polar r, θ | Vr = ṙ, Vθ = r θ̇ | ar = r̈ − r θ̇² aθ = r θ̈ + 2 ṙ θ̇ |
at = a cos β, an = a sin β.[D4-4] ZigZag summary, ch.4 (Prep, 2nd term)
[D1-1] "Planar kinematics of a rigid body" · [D4-5] · [D2-d]
î × ĵ = k̂, ĵ × k̂ = î, k̂ × î = ĵ; reversing the order changes the sign.| Connection | Relation |
|---|---|
| Cord on a drum, rack on a pinion | s = θ r · v = ω r · a = α r |
| Belt, or two meshing gears | ω1/ω2 = α1/α2 = θ1/θ2 = r2/r1 |
| Two wheels on one shaft | same θ, ω, α |
Meshing gears turn in opposite senses [D1-1 p.12].
[D1-2] "Absolute analysis of general plane motion"
S = 5 sin θ → v = 5ω cos θ → a = 5(α cos θ − ω² sin θ).AB sin θ_AB = BC sin θ_BC → ω_BC = AB ω_AB cos θ_AB / (BC cos θ_BC).[D1-3] "Relative motion analysis of general plane motion" · [D2-a] · [D2-b]
[D1-4] "Instantaneous center of rotation" · [D2-c] summary
v_P = ω · r_P/IC, perpendicular to r_P/IC in the sense of ω.Finding the IC [D1-4 pp.2–3]:
v_centre = ω R.[D1-5] "Kinetics of translation motion"
Every problem is drawn as F.B.D = K.D: external forces on one side, m a_G (and I_G α when the body rotates) on the other.
w sin θ − F_f = m aG, N = w cos θ.[D1-6] "Kinetics of rotation motion" · [D4-6] ZigZag summary, ch.6
IO = Σ(Ii + mi di²).[D1-7] "Kinetics of GPM"
aG = aA + α × r_G/A − ω² r_G/A.[D1-8] "Planar kinetics of rigid body: work and energy"
| Work of | U | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | −W Δy | positive when G moves down |
| Spring | −½ k (s2² − s1²) | s = deformation from the free length |
| Couple | M (θ2 − θ1) | ∫ M dθ if M varies with θ |
| Friction | −μk N s | only when slipping; zero for rolling without slip |
| Force | F cos θ · s | ∫ F·ds if F varies; a force kept ⟂ to a bar: P θR |
| Motion | Kinetic energy T |
|---|---|
| Translation | ½ m vG² |
| Rotation about O | ½ IO ω² |
| General plane motion | ½ m vG² + ½ IG ω² = ½ I_IC ω² |
[D1-9] "Conservation of energy" · [D1-11] "Potential energy"
Every line comes from the source tagged at its end, [label p.n], where n is the PDF page. Nothing is added from memory. ⚠ marks a suspected error in the source; see "⚠ Flags" near the end. The lectures are by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Agwa, 1444/2022-2023. The slides follow Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, so equation and table numbers are Shigley's. The sections are by Eng. Ehsan Khaled. Units: the formulas are written as printed. Where the source gives a US form and an SI form, both are listed.
Equation and table numbers are Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, as in the lecturer's slides. Worked examples were recomputed; the results are in the "Worked-example checks" section.
[MD-1]
Each row is one chain of linked Shigley problems (⚠ F13 on the duplicated 13-48).
| Row | Linked problems |
|---|---|
| 1 | 3-1, 4-50, 4-81 |
| 2 | 3-41, 5-78, 5-79 |
| 3 | 3-79, 4-23, 4-29, 4-35, 5-50, 6-37, 7-12, 11-16 |
| 4 | 3-80, 4-24, 4-30, 4-36, 5-51, 6-38, 7-13, 11-17 |
| 5 | 3-81, 4-25, 4-31, 4-37, 5-52, 6-39, 7-14, 11-18 |
| 6 | 3-82, 4-26, 4-32, 4-38, 5-53, 6-40, 7-15, 11-19 |
| 7 | 3-83, 4-27, 4-33, 4-39, 5-54, 6-41, 7-16, 7-24, 7-25, 7-39, 11-29, 11-30, 13-44, 14-37 |
| 8 | 3-84, 4-28, 4-34, 4-40, 5-55, 6-42, 7-17, 7-26, 7-27, 7-40, 11-31, 11-32, 13-45, 14-38 |
| 9 | 3-85, 5-56, 6-43, 7-18, 11-47, 13-48 |
| 10 | 3-87, 5-57, 6-44, 7-19, 11-48, 13-48 |
| 11 | 3-88, 5-58, 6-45, 7-20, 11-20, 13-46, 14-39 |
| 12 | 3-90, 5-59, 6-46, 7-21, 11-21, 13-47, 14-40 |
| 13 | 3-91, 4-41, 4-78, 5-60, 6-47 |
| 14 | 3-92, 5-61, 6-48 |
| 15 | 3-93, 5-62, 6-49 |
| 16 | 3-94, 5-63, 6-50 |
| 17 | 3-95, 4-43, 4-80, 5-64, 5-67, 6-51 |
| 18 | 3-96, 5-65, 6-52 |
| 19 | 3-97, 5-66, 6-53 |
| 20 | 3-98, 5-67 |
A handwritten Arabic note (6 pp) by a former student, signed but unnamed, titled "تصميم الماكينات" (Machine Design). It contains advice and course organisation only, no technical content. The year it describes is not stated. The points, translated:
[MD-2]
Figure: md-belt-open-geometry.jpg (Fig 17-1a) [MD-2 p.9].
Table 17-4. Pulley correction factor Cp for flat belts (columns: small-pulley diameter, in; values are averages approximated from Habasit Engineering Manual curves) [MD-2 p.23]
| Material | 1.6–4 | 4.5–8 | 9–12.5 | 14, 16 | 18–31.5 | Over 31.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leather | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| Polyamide F-0 | 0.95 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| F-1 | 0.70 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| F-2 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| A-2 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| A-3 | — | 0.70 | 0.87 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 1.0 |
| A-4 | — | — | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.92 |
| A-5 | — | — | — | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.91 |
Table 17-2 (SI). Properties of some flat and round belt materials [MD-2 p.25]
Columns: size (mm); minimum pulley diameter (mm); allowable tension per unit width at 3 m/s (10³ N/m); specific weight (kN/m³); coefficient of friction f.
| Material | Specification | Size, mm | Min pulley dia, mm | Allowable tension, 10³ N/m | Specific weight, kN/m³ | f |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leather | 1 ply | t = 4.5 | 75 | 5 | 9.5–12.2 | 0.4 |
| t = 5 | 90 | 6 | 9.5–12.2 | 0.4 | ||
| 2 ply | t = 7 | 115 | 7 | 9.5–12.2 | 0.4 | |
| t = 8 | 150 | 9 | 9.5–12.2 | 0.4 | ||
| t = 9 | 230 | 10 | 9.5–12.2 | 0.4 | ||
| Polyamide | F-0 | t = 0.8 | 15 | 1.8 | 9.5 | 0.5 |
| F-1 | t = 1.3 | 25 | 6 | 9.5 | 0.5 | |
| F-2 | t = 1.8 | 60 | 10 | 13.8 | 0.5 | |
| A-2 | t = 2.8 | 60 | 10 | 10.0 | 0.8 | |
| A-3 | t = 3.3 | 110 | 18 | 11.4 | 0.8 | |
| A-4 | t = 5.0 | 240 | 30 | 10.6 | 0.8 | |
| A-5 | t = 6.4 | 340 | 48 | 10.6 | 0.8 | |
| Urethane | w = 12.7 | t = 1.6 | see Table 17-3 | 1.0 (e) | 10.3–12.2 | 0.7 |
| w = 19 | t = 2.0 | see Table 17-3 | 1.7 (e) | 10.3–12.2 | 0.7 | |
| w = 32 | t = 2.3 | see Table 17-3 | 3.3 (e) | 10.3–12.2 | 0.7 | |
| Round | d = 6 | see Table 17-3 | 1.4 (e) | 10.3–12.2 | 0.7 | |
| d = 10 | 3.3 (e) | |||||
| d = 12 | 5.8 (e) | |||||
| d = 20 | 13 (e) |
The section handout "Machine Design, Sec. (1) Flat Belt" is by Eng. Ehsan Khaled (11 pp; pp. 1–4 typed, pp. 5–11 handwritten, CamScanner) [MD-S1 p.1].
| Material | Specification | Size, in | Min pulley dia, in | Allowable tension, lbf/in | Specific weight, lbf/in³ | f |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leather | 1 ply | t = 11/64 | 3 | 30 | 0.035–0.045 | 0.4 |
| t = 13/64 | 3½ | 33 | 0.035–0.045 | 0.4 | ||
| 2 ply | t = 18/64 | 4½ | 41 | 0.035–0.045 | 0.4 | |
| t = 20/64 | 6 (a) | 50 | 0.035–0.045 | 0.4 | ||
| t = 23/64 | 9 (a) | 60 | 0.035–0.045 | 0.4 | ||
| Polyamide (b) | F-0 (c) | t = 0.03 | 0.60 | 10 | 0.035 | 0.5 |
| F-1 (c) | t = 0.05 | 1.0 | 35 | 0.035 | 0.5 | |
| F-2 (c) | t = 0.07 | 2.4 | 60 | 0.051 | 0.5 | |
| A-2 (c) | t = 0.11 | 2.4 | 60 | 0.037 | 0.8 | |
| A-3 (c) | t = 0.13 | 4.3 | 100 | 0.042 | 0.8 | |
| A-4 (c) | t = 0.20 | 9.5 | 175 | 0.039 | 0.8 | |
| A-5 (c) | t = 0.25 | 13.5 | 275 | 0.039 | 0.8 | |
| Urethane (d) | w = 0.50 in | t = 0.062 | see Table 17-3 | 5.2 (e) | 0.038–0.045 | 0.7 |
| w = 0.75 in | t = 0.078 | see Table 17-3 | 9.8 (e) | 0.038–0.045 | 0.7 | |
| w = 1.25 in | t = 0.090 | see Table 17-3 | 18.9 (e) | 0.038–0.045 | 0.7 | |
| Round d = 1/4 | see Table 17-3 | 8.3 (e) | 0.038–0.045 | 0.7 | ||
| d = 3/8 | 18.6 (e) | 0.038–0.045 | 0.7 | |||
| d = 1/2 | 33.0 (e) | 0.038–0.045 | 0.7 | |||
| d = 3/4 | 74.3 (e) | 0.038–0.045 | 0.7 |
The file is a phone screenshot of the problem list at the end of Shigley Chapter 17 ("Richard Budynas, Keith…", book pp. 927–928); it gives statements only, no answers [MD-SH3 p.1]. Short statements:
[MD-3]
Table 17-9 (SI). Standard V-belt sections; belt angle 40° [MD-3 p.2]
| Section | Width a, mm | Thickness b, mm | Min sheave dia, mm | kW range (one or more belts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 12 | 8.5 | 75 | 0.2–7.5 |
| B | 16 | 11 | 135 | 0.7–18.5 |
| C | 22 | 13 | 230 | 11–75 |
| D | 30 | 19 | 325 | 37–186 |
| E | 38 | 25 | 540 | 75 and up |
Table 17-12 (SI). "Horsepower Ratings of Standard V-Belts": power per belt against sheave pitch diameter (mm) and belt speed (m/s). The power unit is not printed; the worked example uses the values as kW [MD-3 p.10, p.25]. (⚠ F3 on A-85 at 20 m/s.)
| Section | Pitch dia, mm | 5 m/s | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 65 | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.11 | — |
| 75 | 0.49 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.69 | 0.28 | |
| 85 | 0.60 | 0.98 | 1.17 | 1.64 | 0.84 | |
| 95 | 0.69 | 1.16 | 1.43 | 1.49 | 1.28 | |
| 105 | 0.77 | 1.30 | 1.64 | 1.78 | 1.63 | |
| 115 | 0.83 | 1.41 | 1.82 | 2.01 | 1.93 | |
| 125 and up | 0.87 | 1.51 | 1.97 | 2.21 | 2.16 | |
| B | 105 | 0.80 | 1.18 | 1.25 | 0.94 | 0.16 |
| 115 | 0.95 | 1.48 | 1.71 | 1.55 | 0.92 | |
| 125 | 1.07 | 1.74 | 2.09 | 2.06 | 1.57 | |
| 135 | 1.19 | 1.95 | 2.42 | 2.49 | 2.10 | |
| 145 | 1.28 | 2.14 | 2.69 | 2.87 | 2.57 | |
| 155 | 1.36 | 2.31 | 2.94 | 3.19 | 2.98 | |
| 165 | 1.43 | 2.45 | 3.16 | 3.48 | 3.34 | |
| 175 and up | 1.50 | 2.58 | 3.35 | 3.74 | 3.66 | |
| C | 150 | 1.37 | 1.98 | 2.03 | 1.40 | — |
| 175 | 1.85 | 2.94 | 3.46 | 3.31 | 2.33 | |
| 200 | 2.21 | 3.66 | 4.54 | 4.74 | 4.12 | |
| 225 | 2.49 | 4.21 | 5.38 | 5.86 | 5.51 | |
| 250 | 2.72 | 4.66 | 6.05 | 7.16 | 6.63 | |
| 275 | 2.89 | 5.03 | 6.59 | 7.46 | 7.53 | |
| 300 and up | 3.05 | 5.33 | 7.06 | 8.13 | 8.28 | |
| D | 250 | 3.09 | 4.57 | 4.89 | 3.80 | 1.01 |
| 275 | 3.73 | 5.84 | 6.80 | 6.34 | 4.19 | |
| 300 | 4.26 | 6.91 | 8.36 | 8.50 | 6.85 | |
| 325 | 4.71 | 7.83 | 9.70 | 10.30 | 9.10 | |
| 350 | 5.09 | 8.58 | 10.89 | 11.79 | 11.04 | |
| 375 | 5.42 | 9.25 | 11.86 | 13.13 | 12.68 | |
| 400 | 5.71 | 9.85 | 12.76 | 14.32 | 14.17 | |
| 425 and up | 5.98 | 10.37 | 13.50 | 15.37 | 15.44 | |
| E | 400 | 6.48 | 10.44 | 13.06 | 13.50 | 11.41 |
| 450 | 7.40 | 12.46 | 15.82 | 17.16 | 16.04 | |
| 500 | 8.13 | 13.95 | 18.05 | 20.07 | 19.69 | |
| 550 | 8.73 | 15.14 | 19.84 | 22.53 | 22.75 | |
| 600 | 9.25 | 16.11 | 21.34 | 24.54 | 25.22 | |
| 650 | 9.70 | 17.01 | 22.60 | 26.19 | 27.38 | |
| 700 and up | 10.00 | 17.68 | 23.72 | 27.68 | 29.17 |
Table 17-13. Angle-of-wrap correction factor K1 (VV = V sheave on both pulleys; V-flat = V sheave driving a flat pulley) [MD-3 p.12]
| (D − d)/C | θ, deg | K1 (VV) | K1 (V-flat) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 180 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 0.10 | 174.3 | 0.99 | 0.76 |
| 0.20 | 166.5 | 0.97 | 0.78 |
| 0.30 | 162.7 | 0.96 | 0.79 |
| 0.40 | 156.9 | 0.94 | 0.80 |
| 0.50 | 151.0 | 0.93 | 0.81 |
| 0.60 | 145.1 | 0.91 | 0.83 |
| 0.70 | 139.0 | 0.89 | 0.84 |
| 0.80 | 132.8 | 0.87 | 0.85 |
| 0.90 | 126.5 | 0.85 | 0.85 |
| 1.00 | 120.0 | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| 1.10 | 113.3 | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| 1.20 | 106.3 | 0.77 | 0.77 |
| 1.30 | 98.9 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| 1.40 | 91.1 | 0.70 | 0.70 |
| 1.50 | 82.8 | 0.65 | 0.65 |
Table 17-14 (SI). Belt-length correction factor K2: multiply the rated power per belt by this factor [MD-3 p.13]
| K2 | A belts, m | B belts | C belts | D belts | E belts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.85 | up to 0.88 | up to 1.15 | up to 1.88 | up to 3.2 | — |
| 0.90 | 0.95–1.15 | 1.2–1.5 | 2.03–2.4 | 3.6–4.05 | up to 4.88 |
| 0.95 | 1.2–1.38 | 1.55–1.88 | 2.63–3.0 | 4.33–5.25 | 5.25–6.0 |
| 1.00 | 1.5–1.88 | 1.95–2.43 | 3.2–3.95 | 6.0 | 6.75–7.5 |
| 1.05 | 1.95–2.25 | 2.63–3.0 | 4.05–4.88 | 6.75–8.25 | 8.25–9.75 |
| 1.10 | 2.4–2.8 | 3.2–3.6 | 5.25–6.0 | 9.0–10.5 | 10.5–12.0 |
| 1.15 | 3.0 and up | 3.95–4.5 | 6.75–7.5 | 12.0 | 13.5–15.0 |
| 1.20 | — | 4.88 and up | 8.25 and up | 13.5 and up | 16.5 |
Table 17-15. Suggested service factors Ks for V-belt drives [MD-3 p.17]
| Driven machinery | Normal-torque source | High or nonuniform-torque source |
|---|---|---|
| Uniform | 1.0–1.2 | 1.1–1.3 |
| Light shock | 1.1–1.3 | 1.2–1.4 |
| Medium shock | 1.2–1.4 | 1.4–1.6 |
| Heavy shock | 1.3–1.5 | 1.5–1.8 |
Table 17-16. Some V-belt parameters (Gates Rubber Co.) [MD-3 p.20]
| Section | Kb | Kc |
|---|---|---|
| A | 220 | 0.561 |
| B | 576 | 0.965 |
| C | 1600 | 1.716 |
| D | 5680 | 3.498 |
| E | 10 850 | 5.041 |
| 3V | 230 | 0.425 |
| 5V | 1098 | 1.217 |
| 8V | 4830 | 3.288 |
Table 17-17. Durability parameters for some V-belt sections (K units are not printed; minimum sheave diameter in mm) [MD-3 p.24]
| Section | K (10⁸–10⁹ force peaks) | b | K (10⁹–10¹⁰) | b | Min sheave dia, mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2999 | 11.089 | — | — | 75 |
| B | 5309 | 10.926 | — | — | 125 |
| C | 9069 | 11.173 | — | — | 215 |
| D | 18 726 | 11.105 | — | — | 325 |
| E | 26 791 | 11.100 | — | — | 540 |
| 3V | 3240 | 12.464 | 4726 | 10.153 | 66 |
| 5V | 7360 | 12.593 | 10 653 | 10.283 | 177 |
| 8V | 16 189 | 12.629 | 23 376 | 10.319 | 312 |
The section handout "Machine Design, Sec. (2) V Belt" is by Eng. Ehsan Khaled (13 pp; pp. 1–6 typed, pp. 7–13 handwritten) [MD-S2 p.1]. The separate "Sec2 tables" file (الجداول, 6 pp) is page-for-page identical to MD-S2 pp. 1–6 [MD-S2T p.1–6]. Everything below is in US units; the SI versions are in 3.1–3.4.
Table 17-14 (US). Belt-length correction factor K2, nominal belt length in inches [MD-S2 p.3]
| K2 | A belts | B belts | C belts | D belts | E belts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.85 | up to 35 | up to 46 | up to 75 | up to 128 | — |
| 0.90 | 38–46 | 48–60 | 81–96 | 144–162 | up to 195 |
| 0.95 | 48–55 | 62–75 | 105–120 | 173–210 | 210–240 |
| 1.00 | 60–75 | 78–97 | 128–158 | 240 | 270–300 |
| 1.05 | 78–90 | 105–120 | 162–195 | 270–330 | 330–390 |
| 1.10 | 96–112 | 128–144 | 210–240 | 360–420 | 420–480 |
| 1.15 | 120 and up | 158–180 | 270–300 | 480 | 540–600 |
| 1.20 | — | 195 and up | 330 and up | 540 and up | 660 |
Table 17-12 (US). Horsepower ratings of standard V belts (hp per belt; belt speed in ft/min) [MD-S2 p.3]
| Section | Sheave pitch dia, in | 1000 | 2000 | 3000 | 4000 | 5000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2.6 | 0.47 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 0.15 | — |
| 3.0 | 0.66 | 1.01 | 1.12 | 0.93 | 0.38 | |
| 3.4 | 0.81 | 1.31 | 1.57 | 1.53 | 1.12 | |
| 3.8 | 0.93 | 1.55 | 1.92 | 2.00 | 1.71 | |
| 4.2 | 1.03 | 1.74 | 2.20 | 2.38 | 2.19 | |
| 4.6 | 1.11 | 1.89 | 2.44 | 2.69 | 2.58 | |
| 5.0 and up | 1.17 | 2.03 | 2.64 | 2.96 | 2.89 | |
| B | 4.2 | 1.07 | 1.58 | 1.68 | 1.26 | 0.22 |
| 4.6 | 1.27 | 1.99 | 2.29 | 2.08 | 1.24 | |
| 5.0 | 1.44 | 2.33 | 2.80 | 2.76 | 2.10 | |
| 5.4 | 1.59 | 2.62 | 3.24 | 3.34 | 2.82 | |
| 5.8 | 1.72 | 2.87 | 3.61 | 3.85 | 3.45 | |
| 6.2 | 1.82 | 3.09 | 3.94 | 4.28 | 4.00 | |
| 6.6 | 1.92 | 3.29 | 4.23 | 4.67 | 4.48 | |
| 7.0 and up | 2.01 | 3.46 | 4.49 | 5.01 | 4.90 | |
| C | 6.0 | 1.84 | 2.66 | 2.72 | 1.87 | — |
| 7.0 | 2.48 | 3.94 | 4.64 | 4.44 | 3.12 | |
| 8.0 | 2.96 | 4.90 | 6.09 | 6.36 | 5.52 | |
| 9.0 | 3.34 | 5.65 | 7.21 | 7.86 | 7.39 | |
| 10.0 | 3.64 | 6.25 | 8.11 | 9.06 | 8.89 | |
| 11.0 | 3.88 | 6.74 | 8.84 | 10.0 | 10.1 | |
| 12.0 and up | 4.09 | 7.15 | 9.46 | 10.9 | 11.1 | |
| D | 10.0 | 4.14 | 6.13 | 6.55 | 5.09 | 1.35 |
| 11.0 | 5.00 | 7.83 | 9.11 | 8.50 | 5.62 | |
| 12.0 | 5.71 | 9.26 | 11.2 | 11.4 | 9.18 | |
| 13.0 | 6.31 | 10.5 | 13.0 | 13.8 | 12.2 | |
| 14.0 | 6.82 | 11.5 | 14.6 | 15.8 | 14.8 | |
| 15.0 | 7.27 | 12.4 | 15.9 | 17.6 | 17.0 | |
| 16.0 | 7.66 | 13.2 | 17.1 | 19.2 | 19.0 | |
| 17.0 and up | 8.01 | 13.9 | 18.1 | 20.6 | 20.7 | |
| E | 16.0 | 8.68 | 14.0 | 17.5 | 18.1 | 15.3 |
| 18.0 | 9.92 | 16.7 | 21.2 | 23.0 | 21.5 | |
| 20.0 | 10.9 | 18.7 | 24.2 | 26.9 | 26.4 | |
| 22.0 | 11.7 | 20.3 | 26.6 | 30.2 | 30.5 | |
| 24.0 | 12.4 | 21.6 | 28.6 | 32.9 | 33.8 | |
| 26.0 | 13.0 | 22.8 | 30.3 | 35.1 | 36.7 | |
| 28.0 and up | 13.4 | 23.7 | 31.8 | 37.1 | 39.1 |
Table 17-17 (US). Durability parameters for some V-belt sections [MD-S2 p.6]
| Section | K (10⁸–10⁹ force peaks) | b | K (10⁹–10¹⁰) | b | Min sheave dia, in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 674 | 11.089 | — | — | 3.0 |
| B | 1193 | 10.926 | — | — | 5.0 |
| C | 2038 | 11.173 | — | — | 8.5 |
| D | 4208 | 11.105 | — | — | 13.0 |
| E | 6061 | 11.100 | — | — | 21.6 |
| 3V | 728 | 12.464 | 1062 | 10.153 | 2.65 |
| 5V | 1654 | 12.593 | 2394 | 10.283 | 7.1 |
| 8V | 3638 | 12.629 | 5253 | 10.319 | 12.5 |
The file is a screenshot of Shigley problems 17-15 to 17-24 (the top line is the end of 17-14, "… stainless steel belt."); statements only [MD-SH2 p.1]. Short statements:
[MD-4]
Table 13-1. Standard tooth systems for spur gears (Pd = diametral pitch of the pinion) [MD-4 p.7]
| System | Pressure angle φ | Addendum a | Dedendum b |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full depth | 20° | 1/Pd or 1m | 1.25/Pd or 1.25m; 1.35/Pd or 1.35m |
| Full depth | 22.5° | 1/Pd or 1m | 1.25/Pd or 1.25m; 1.35/Pd or 1.35m |
| Full depth | 25° | 1/Pd or 1m | 1.25/Pd or 1.25m; 1.35/Pd or 1.35m |
| Stub | 20° | 0.8/Pd or 0.8m | 1/Pd or 1m |
Interference limits (full depth) [MD-4 p.25–26]
| φ | NP | Max NG (13-12) | Integer NG | mG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20° | 13 | 16.45 | 16 | 1.23 |
| 20° | 14 | 26.12 | 26 | 1.86 |
| 20° | 15 | 45.49 | 45 | 3 |
| 20° | 16 | 101.07 | 101 | 6.31 |
| 20° | 17 | 1309.86 | 1309 | 77 |
| 25° | 9 | 13.33 | 13 | 1.44 |
| 25° | 10 | 32.39 | 32 | 3.2 |
| 25° | 11 | 249.23 | 249 | 22.64 |
The section handout "Machine Design, Sec. (3) Introduction to Gears" is by Eng. Ehsan Khaled (10 pp, typed). It restates the lecture material of 4.1–4.4 with Shigley figures. It has no worked examples. The items below are those it words differently or adds.
The file (شيت4, 3 pp) is a scan of the Shigley Chapter 13 problem list, book pp. 724–728; problems marked * are linked to other chapters (Table 1-2). Statements only [MD-SH4 p.1–3]. Short statements:
[MD-41, MD-S4]
Figure: md-helical-force-components.jpg (W resolved into Wt, Wr, Wa for a helical tooth) [MD-S4 p.4].
Lecture file "Lecture_4-1" is titled on its first slide "Lecture #4, Design of Mechanical Elements: Gears: Spur, Bevel and Helical" [MD-41 p.1]. Its pages 1–42 repeat the Lecture #4 deck page for page (section 4 above; the MD-4 page numbers equal the MD-41 page numbers). Pages 43–88 add force analysis for spur, bevel, helical and worm gearing; page 89 is "Thank you / Questions" [MD-41 p.89]. It does not contain the Lewis or AGMA stress equations.
Table 13-5. Recommended pressure angles and tooth depths for worm gearing [MD-41 p.69]
| Lead angle λ, deg | Pressure angle φn, deg | Addendum a | Dedendum bG |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–15 | 14½ | 0.3683px | 0.3683px |
| 15–30 | 20 | 0.3683px | 0.3683px |
| 30–35 | 25 | 0.2865px | 0.3314px |
| 35–40 | 25 | 0.2546px | 0.2947px |
| 40–45 | 30 | 0.2228px | 0.2578px |
| Lead angle λ, deg | 1.0 | 2.5 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 15.0 | 20.0 | 30.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency η, % | 25.2 | 45.7 | 62.6 | 71.3 | 76.6 | 82.7 | 85.6 | 88.7 |
[MD-5]
Lecture file "Lecture_5.pdf" (92 pp) is titled "Machine Design (DPE 301), Lecture #5, Design of Mechanical Elements: Gears: Spur, Helical", Prof. Dr. Mohamed Agwa, 1444/2022-2023 [MD-5 p.1]. It is Shigley Chapter 14 (not a fatigue lecture), although it uses the Marin factors of [MD-F] (section 10) in Example 14-2.
Table 14-2. Values of the Lewis form factor Y (normal pressure angle 20°, full-depth teeth, diametral pitch of unity in the plane of rotation) [MD-5 p.6]
| N | Y | N | Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 0.245 | 28 | 0.353 |
| 13 | 0.261 | 30 | 0.359 |
| 14 | 0.277 | 34 | 0.371 |
| 15 | 0.290 | 38 | 0.384 |
| 16 | 0.296 | 43 | 0.397 |
| 17 | 0.303 | 50 | 0.409 |
| 18 | 0.309 | 60 | 0.422 |
| 19 | 0.314 | 75 | 0.435 |
| 20 | 0.322 | 100 | 0.447 |
| 21 | 0.328 | 150 | 0.460 |
| 22 | 0.331 | 300 | 0.472 |
| 24 | 0.337 | 400 | 0.480 |
| 26 | 0.346 | Rack | 0.485 |
Table 14-3. Repeatedly applied bending strength St at 10⁷ cycles and 0.99 reliability for steel gears (Source: ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04) [MD-5 p.32]
| Material | Heat treatment | Min surface hardness | Grade 1, psi (MPa) | Grade 2 | Grade 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steel | Through-hardened | See Fig 14-2 | See Fig 14-2 | See Fig 14-2 | — |
| Flame or induction hardened, type A pattern | See Table 8* | 45 000 (310) | 55 000 (380) | — | |
| Flame or induction hardened, type B pattern | See Table 8* | 22 000 (151) | 22 000 (151) | — | |
| Carburized and hardened | See Table 9* | 55 000 (380) | 65 000 (448) or 70 000 (482) | 75 000 (517) | |
| Nitrided (through-hardened steels) | 83.5 HR15N | See Fig 14-3 | See Fig 14-3 | — | |
| Nitralloy 135M, Nitralloy N, 2.5% chrome (no aluminum) | Nitrided | 87.5 HR15N | See Fig 14-4 | See Fig 14-4 | See Fig 14-4 |
Table 14-4. Repeatedly applied bending strength St for iron and bronze gears at 10⁷ cycles and 0.99 reliability (Source: ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04) [MD-5 p.36]
| Material | Designation | Heat treatment | Typical min surface hardness | St, psi (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASTM A48 gray cast iron | Class 20 | As cast | — | 5000 (35) |
| Class 30 | As cast | 174 HB | 8500 (58) | |
| Class 40 | As cast | 201 HB | 13 000 (90) | |
| ASTM A536 ductile (nodular) iron | Grade 60-40-18 | Annealed | 140 HB | 22 000–33 000 (151–227) |
| Grade 80-55-06 | Quenched and tempered | 179 HB | 22 000–33 000 (151–227) | |
| Grade 100-70-03 | Quenched and tempered | 229 HB | 27 000–40 000 (186–275) | |
| Grade 120-90-02 | Quenched and tempered | 269 HB | 31 000–44 000 (213–275) | |
| Bronze | — | Sand cast | Min tensile strength 40 000 psi | 5700 (39) |
| ASTM B-148 Alloy 954 | Heat treated | Min tensile strength 90 000 psi | 23 600 (163) |
Table 14-6. Repeatedly applied contact strength Sc at 10⁷ cycles and 0.99 reliability for steel gears (Source: ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04) [MD-5 p.38]
| Material | Heat treatment | Min surface hardness | Grade 1, psi (MPa) | Grade 2 | Grade 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steel | Through hardened | See Fig 14-5 | See Fig 14-5 | See Fig 14-5 | — |
| Flame or induction hardened | 50 HRC | 170 000 (1172) | 190 000 (1310) | — | |
| 54 HRC | 175 000 (1206) | 195 000 (1344) | — | ||
| Carburized and hardened | See Table 9* | 180 000 (1240) | 225 000 (1551) | 275 000 (1896) | |
| Nitrided (through-hardened steels) | 83.5 HR15N | 150 000 (1035) | 163 000 (1123) | 175 000 (1206) | |
| 84.5 HR15N | 155 000 (1068) | 168 000 (1158) | 180 000 (1240) | ||
| 2.5% chrome (no aluminum) | Nitrided | 87.5 HR15N | 155 000 (1068) | 172 000 (1186) | 189 000 (1303) |
| Nitralloy 135M | Nitrided | 90.0 HR15N | 170 000 (1172) | 183 000 (1261) | 195 000 (1344) |
| Nitralloy N | Nitrided | 90.0 HR15N | 172 000 (1186) | 188 000 (1296) | 205 000 (1413) |
| 2.5% chrome (no aluminum) | Nitrided | 90.0 HR15N | 176 000 (1213) | 196 000 (1351) | 216 000 (1490) |
Table 14-7. Repeatedly applied contact strength Sc at 10⁷ cycles and 0.99 reliability for iron and bronze gears (Source: ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04) [MD-5 p.40]
| Material | Designation | Heat treatment | Typical min surface hardness | Sc, psi (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASTM A48 gray cast iron | Class 20 | As cast | — | 50 000–60 000 (344–415) |
| Class 30 | As cast | 174 HB | 65 000–75 000 (448–517) | |
| Class 40 | As cast | 201 HB | 75 000–85 000 (517–586) | |
| ASTM A536 ductile (nodular) iron | Grade 60-40-18 | Annealed | 140 HB | 77 000–92 000 (530–634) |
| Grade 80-55-06 | Quenched and tempered | 179 HB | 77 000–92 000 (530–634) | |
| Grade 100-70-03 | Quenched and tempered | 229 HB | 92 000–112 000 (634–772) | |
| Grade 120-90-02 | Quenched and tempered | 269 HB | 103 000–126 000 (710–868) | |
| Bronze | — | Sand cast | Min tensile strength 40 000 psi | 30 000 (206) |
| ASTM B-148 Alloy 954 | Heat treated | Min tensile strength 90 000 psi | 65 000 (448) |
Table 14-8. Elastic coefficient Cp (ZE), √psi (√MPa) (Source: AGMA 218.01). Columns: gear material and EG, psi (MPa) [MD-5 p.48]
| Pinion material (EP) | Steel 30×10⁶ (2×10⁵) | Malleable iron 25×10⁶ (1.7×10⁵) | Nodular iron 24×10⁶ (1.7×10⁵) | Cast iron 22×10⁶ (1.5×10⁵) | Aluminum bronze 17.5×10⁶ (1.2×10⁵) | Tin bronze 16×10⁶ (1.1×10⁵) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steel, 30×10⁶ (2×10⁵) | 2300 (191) | 2180 (181) | 2160 (179) | 2100 (174) | 1950 (162) | 1900 (158) |
| Malleable iron, 25×10⁶ (1.7×10⁵) | 2180 (181) | 2090 (174) | 2070 (172) | 2020 (168) | 1900 (158) | 1850 (154) |
| Nodular iron, 24×10⁶ (1.7×10⁵) | 2160 (179) | 2070 (172) | 2050 (170) | 2000 (166) | 1880 (156) | 1830 (152) |
| Cast iron, 22×10⁶ (1.5×10⁵) | 2100 (174) | 2020 (168) | 2000 (166) | 1960 (163) | 1850 (154) | 1800 (149) |
| Aluminum bronze, 17.5×10⁶ (1.2×10⁵) | 1950 (162) | 1900 (158) | 1880 (156) | 1850 (154) | 1750 (145) | 1700 (141) |
| Tin bronze, 16×10⁶ (1.1×10⁵) | 1900 (158) | 1850 (154) | 1830 (152) | 1800 (149) | 1700 (141) | 1650 (137) |
Table 14-9. Empirical constants A, B, C for Eq (14-34), face width F in inches (Source: ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04; see ANSI/AGMA 2101-D04, pp. 20–22, for the SI formulation) [MD-5 p.59]
| Condition | A | B | C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open gearing | 0.247 | 0.0167 | −0.765(10⁻⁴) |
| Commercial, enclosed units | 0.127 | 0.0158 | −0.930(10⁻⁴) |
| Precision, enclosed units | 0.0675 | 0.0128 | −0.926(10⁻⁴) |
| Extraprecision enclosed gear units | 0.00360 | 0.0102 | −0.822(10⁻⁴) |
[MD-S5]
The lecture derivation of these factors (Lecture #4-1) is not available. The equation and figure numbers below are the ones printed in the Shigley roadmaps [MD-S5 p.1–2].
Overload factor Ko [MD-S5 p.1–2]
| Power source | Driven: uniform | Moderate shock | Heavy shock |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uniform | 1.00 | 1.25 | 1.75 |
| Light shock | 1.25 | 1.50 | 2.00 |
| Medium shock | 1.50 | 1.75 | 2.25 |
[MD-6]
Table 16-1. Parameters for a circular-pad caliper brake (Source: G. A. Fazekas, "On Circular Spot Brakes," Trans. ASME, J. Engineering for Industry, vol. 94, Series B, no. 3, Aug 1972, pp. 859–863) [MD-6 p.66]
| R/e | δ = re/e | pmax/pav |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| 0.1 | 0.983 | 1.093 |
| 0.2 | 0.969 | 1.212 |
| 0.3 | 0.957 | 1.367 |
| 0.4 | 0.947 | 1.578 |
| 0.5 | 0.938 | 1.875 |
Table 16-3. Characteristics of friction materials for brakes and clutches [MD-6 p.82]
| Material | f | p_max, psi | T inst, °F | T cont, °F | V_max, ft/min | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cermet | 0.32 | 150 | 1500 | 750 | — | Brakes and clutches |
| Sintered metal (dry) | 0.29–0.33 | 300–400 | 930–1020 | 570–660 | 3600 | Clutches and caliper disk brakes |
| Sintered metal (wet) | 0.06–0.08 | 500 | 930 | 570 | 3600 | Clutches |
| Rigid molded asbestos (dry) | 0.35–0.41 | 100 | 660–750 | 350 | 3600 | Drum brakes and clutches |
| Rigid molded asbestos (wet) | 0.06 | 300 | 660 | 350 | 3600 | Industrial clutches |
| Rigid molded asbestos pads | 0.31–0.49 | 750 | 930–1380 | 440–660 | 4800 | Disk brakes |
| Rigid molded nonasbestos | 0.33–0.63 | 100–150 | — | 500–750 | 4800–7500 | Clutches and brakes |
| Semirigid molded asbestos | 0.37–0.41 | 100 | 660 | 300 | 3600 | Clutches and brakes |
| Flexible molded asbestos | 0.39–0.45 | 100 | 660–750 | 300–350 | 3600 | Clutches and brakes |
| Wound asbestos yarn and wire | 0.38 | 100 | 660 | 300 | 3600 | Vehicle clutches |
| Woven asbestos yarn and wire | 0.38 | 100 | 500 | 260 | 3600 | Industrial clutches and brakes |
| Woven cotton | 0.47 | 100 | 230 | 170 | 3600 | Industrial clutches and brakes |
| Resilient paper (wet) | 0.09–0.15 | 400 | 300 | — | PV < 500 000 psi·ft/min | Clutches and transmission bands |
[MD-7]
Figure: md-bearing-nomenclature.jpg (Fig 11-1) [MD-7 p.2].
| Manufacturer | Rating life, rev | x0 | θ | b | Common for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90(10⁶) | 0 | 4.48 | 1.5 | tapered roller bearings |
| 2 | 1(10⁶) | 0.02 | 4.459 | 1.483 | ball and straight roller bearings |
Table 11-2. Dimensions and load ratings for single-row 02-series deep-groove and angular-contact ball bearings [MD-7 p.32] (also partly on p.15)
| Bore, mm | OD, mm | Width, mm | Fillet r, mm | dS, mm | dH, mm | Deep-groove C10, kN | Deep-groove C0, kN | Angular-contact C10, kN | Angular-contact C0, kN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 30 | 9 | 0.6 | 12.5 | 27 | 5.07 | 2.24 | 4.94 | 2.12 |
| 12 | 32 | 10 | 0.6 | 14.5 | 28 | 6.89 | 3.10 | 7.02 | 3.05 |
| 15 | 35 | 11 | 0.6 | 17.5 | 31 | 7.80 | 3.55 | 8.06 | 3.65 |
| 17 | 40 | 12 | 0.6 | 19.5 | 34 | 9.56 | 4.50 | 9.95 | 4.75 |
| 20 | 47 | 14 | 1.0 | 25 | 41 | 12.7 | 6.20 | 13.3 | 6.55 |
| 25 | 52 | 15 | 1.0 | 30 | 47 | 14.0 | 6.95 | 14.8 | 7.65 |
| 30 | 62 | 16 | 1.0 | 35 | 55 | 19.5 | 10.0 | 20.3 | 11.0 |
| 35 | 72 | 17 | 1.0 | 41 | 65 | 25.5 | 13.7 | 27.0 | 15.0 |
| 40 | 80 | 18 | 1.0 | 46 | 72 | 30.7 | 16.6 | 31.9 | 18.6 |
| 45 | 85 | 19 | 1.0 | 52 | 77 | 33.2 | 18.6 | 35.8 | 21.2 |
| 50 | 90 | 20 | 1.0 | 56 | 82 | 35.1 | 19.6 | 37.7 | 22.8 |
| 55 | 100 | 21 | 1.5 | 63 | 90 | 43.6 | 25.0 | 46.2 | 28.5 |
| 60 | 110 | 22 | 1.5 | 70 | 99 | 47.5 | 28.0 | 55.9 | 35.5 |
| 65 | 120 | 23 | 1.5 | 74 | 109 | 55.9 | 34.0 | 63.7 | 41.5 |
| 70 | 125 | 24 | 1.5 | 79 | 114 | 61.8 | 37.5 | 68.9 | 45.5 |
| 75 | 130 | 25 | 1.5 | 86 | 119 | 66.3 | 40.5 | 71.5 | 49.0 |
| 80 | 140 | 26 | 2.0 | 93 | 127 | 70.2 | 45.0 | 80.6 | 55.0 |
| 85 | 150 | 28 | 2.0 | 99 | 136 | 83.2 | 53.0 | 90.4 | 63.0 |
| 90 | 160 | 30 | 2.0 | 104 | 146 | 95.6 | 62.0 | 106 | 73.5 |
| 95 | 170 | 32 | 2.0 | 110 | 156 | 108 | 69.5 | 121 | 85.0 |
Table 11-3. Dimensions and basic load ratings for cylindrical roller bearings [MD-7 p.34]
| Bore, mm | 02 OD | 02 Width | 02 C10, kN | 02 C0, kN | 03 OD | 03 Width | 03 C10, kN | 03 C0, kN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 52 | 15 | 16.8 | 8.8 | 62 | 17 | 28.6 | 15.0 |
| 30 | 62 | 16 | 22.4 | 12.0 | 72 | 19 | 36.9 | 20.0 |
| 35 | 72 | 17 | 31.9 | 17.6 | 80 | 21 | 44.6 | 27.1 |
| 40 | 80 | 18 | 41.8 | 24.0 | 90 | 23 | 56.1 | 32.5 |
| 45 | 85 | 19 | 44.0 | 25.5 | 100 | 25 | 72.1 | 45.4 |
| 50 | 90 | 20 | 45.7 | 27.5 | 110 | 27 | 88.0 | 52.0 |
| 55 | 100 | 21 | 56.1 | 34.0 | 120 | 29 | 102 | 67.2 |
| 60 | 110 | 22 | 64.4 | 43.1 | 130 | 31 | 123 | 76.5 |
| 65 | 120 | 23 | 76.5 | 51.2 | 140 | 33 | 138 | 85.0 |
| 70 | 125 | 24 | 79.2 | 51.2 | 150 | 35 | 151 | 102 |
| 75 | 130 | 25 | 93.1 | 63.2 | 160 | 37 | 183 | 125 |
| 80 | 140 | 26 | 106 | 69.4 | 170 | 39 | 190 | 125 |
| 85 | 150 | 28 | 119 | 78.3 | 180 | 41 | 212 | 149 |
| 90 | 160 | 30 | 142 | 100 | 190 | 43 | 242 | 160 |
| 95 | 170 | 32 | 165 | 112 | 200 | 45 | 264 | 189 |
| 100 | 180 | 34 | 183 | 125 | 215 | 47 | 303 | 220 |
| 110 | 200 | 38 | 229 | 167 | 240 | 50 | 391 | 304 |
| 120 | 215 | 40 | 260 | 183 | 260 | 55 | 457 | 340 |
| 130 | 230 | 40 | 270 | 193 | 280 | 58 | 539 | 408 |
| 140 | 250 | 42 | 319 | 240 | 300 | 62 | 682 | 454 |
| 150 | 270 | 45 | 446 | 260 | 320 | 65 | 781 | 502 |
Table 11-1. Equivalent radial load factors for ball bearings (*use 0.014 if Fa/C0 < 0.014) [MD-7 p.38]
| Fa/C0 | e | X1 | Y1 | X2 | Y2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.014* | 0.19 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.56 | 2.30 |
| 0.021 | 0.21 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.56 | 2.15 |
| 0.028 | 0.22 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.56 | 1.99 |
| 0.042 | 0.24 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.56 | 1.85 |
| 0.056 | 0.26 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.56 | 1.71 |
| 0.070 | 0.27 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.56 | 1.63 |
| 0.084 | 0.28 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.56 | 1.55 |
| 0.110 | 0.30 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.56 | 1.45 |
| 0.17 | 0.34 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.56 | 1.31 |
| 0.28 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.56 | 1.15 |
| 0.42 | 0.42 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.56 | 1.04 |
| 0.56 | 0.44 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.56 | 1.00 |
Table 11-4. Bearing-life recommendations for various classes of machinery [MD-7 p.40]
| Type of application | Life, kh |
|---|---|
| Instruments and apparatus for infrequent use | up to 0.5 |
| Aircraft engines | 0.5–2 |
| Machines for short or intermittent operation where service interruption is of minor importance | 4–8 |
| Machines for intermittent service where reliable operation is of great importance | 8–14 |
| Machines for 8-h service that are not always fully utilized | 14–20 |
| Machines for 8-h service that are fully utilized | 20–30 |
| Machines for continuous 24-h service | 50–60 |
| Machines for continuous 24-h service where reliability is of extreme importance | 100–200 |
Table 11-5. Load-application factors af [MD-7 p.41]
| Type of application | Load factor |
|---|---|
| Precision gearing | 1.0–1.1 |
| Commercial gearing | 1.1–1.3 |
| Applications with poor bearing seals | 1.2 |
| Machinery with no impact | 1.0–1.2 |
| Machinery with light impact | 1.2–1.5 |
| Machinery with moderate impact | 1.5–3.0 |
[MD-F]
(The fatigue lecture, Lecture #5, is not available. Only the factor sheet is covered.)
Surface-factor coefficients [MD-F p.1]
| Surface finish | a (Sut in kpsi) | a (Sut in MPa) | Exponent b |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ground | 1.34 | 1.58 | −0.085 |
| Machined or cold-drawn | 2.70 | 4.51 | −0.265 |
| Hot-rolled | 14.4 | 57.7 | −0.718 |
| As-forged | 39.9 | 272. | −0.995 |
Temperature factor kd = ST/SRT [MD-F p.2]
| T, °C | ST/SRT | T, °F | ST/SRT |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 1.000 | 70 | 1.000 |
| 50 | 1.010 | 100 | 1.008 |
| 100 | 1.020 | 200 | 1.020 |
| 150 | 1.025 | 300 | 1.024 |
| 200 | 1.020 | 400 | 1.018 |
| 250 | 1.000 | 500 | 0.995 |
| 300 | 0.975 | 600 | 0.963 |
| 350 | 0.943 | 700 | 0.927 |
| 400 | 0.900 | 800 | 0.872 |
| 450 | 0.843 | 900 | 0.797 |
| 500 | 0.768 | 1000 | 0.698 |
| 550 | 0.672 | 1100 | 0.567 |
| 600 | 0.549 |
Reliability factor ke [MD-F p.2]
| Reliability, % | Transformation variate za | ke |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | 0 | 1.000 |
| 90 | 1.288 | 0.897 |
| 95 | 1.645 | 0.868 |
| 99 | 2.326 | 0.814 |
| 99.9 | 3.091 | 0.753 |
| 99.99 | 3.719 | 0.702 |
| 99.999 | 4.265 | 0.659 |
| 99.9999 | 4.753 | 0.620 |
[MD-K]
Charts included (σ0 is as printed in each caption)
| Figure | Geometry and loading | Nominal stress | Axes / curves | Page |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-15-1 | Bar in tension or simple compression with a transverse hole | σ0 = F/A, A = (w − d)t | Kt against d/w (0–0.8) | [MD-K p.1] |
| A-15-2 | Rectangular bar with a transverse hole in bending | σ0 = Mc/I, I = (w − d)h³/12 | d/w; curves d/h = 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, ∞ | [MD-K p.1] |
| A-15-3 | Notched rectangular bar in tension or simple compression | σ0 = F/A, A = dt | r/d (0–0.30); w/d = 3, 1.5, 1.2, 1.1, 1.05 | [MD-K p.1] |
| A-15-4 | Notched rectangular bar in bending | σ0 = Mc/I, c = d/2, I = td³/12 | r/d; w/d = ∞, 1.5, 1.10, 1.05, 1.02 | [MD-K p.2] |
| A-15-5 | Rectangular filleted bar in tension or simple compression | σ0 = F/A, A = dt | r/d; D/d = 1.50, 1.10, 1.05, 1.02 | [MD-K p.2] |
| A-15-6 | Rectangular filleted bar in bending | σ0 = Mc/I, c = d/2, I = td³/12 | r/d; D/d = 3, 1.3, 1.1, 1.05, 1.02 | [MD-K p.2] |
| A-15-7 | Round shaft with shoulder fillet in tension | σ0 = F/A, A = πd²/4 | r/d; D/d = 1.50, 1.10, 1.05, 1.02 | [MD-K p.3] |
| A-15-8 | Round shaft with shoulder fillet in torsion | τ0 = Tc/J, c = d/2, J = πd⁴/32 | Kts against r/d; D/d = 2, 1.33, 1.20, 1.09 | [MD-K p.3] |
| A-15-9 | Round shaft with shoulder fillet in bending | σ0 = Mc/I, c = d/2, I = πd⁴/64 | r/d; D/d = 3, 1.5, 1.10, 1.05, 1.02 | [MD-K p.3] |
| A-15-10 | Round shaft in torsion with a transverse hole | J/c = πD³/16 − dD²/6 (approx.) | Kts against d/D (0–0.30); curves Kts,A and Kts,B | [MD-K p.4] |
| A-15-11 | Round shaft in bending with a transverse hole | σ0 = M/[(πD³/32) − (dD²/6)], approx. | Kt against d/D | [MD-K p.4] |
| A-15-12 | Plate loaded in tension by a pin through a hole | σ0 = F/A, A = (w − d)t; with clearance, increase Kt 35 to 50% (Frocht and Hill, 1940) | Kt against d/w; h/w = 0.35, 0.50, ≥ 1.0 | [MD-K p.4] |
| A-15-13 | Grooved round bar in tension | σ0 = F/A, A = πd²/4 | r/d; D/d = 1.50, 1.15, 1.05, 1.02 | [MD-K p.5] |
| A-15-14 | Grooved round bar in bending | σ0 = Mc/I, c = d/2, I = πd⁴/64 | r/d; D/d = 1.50, 1.05, 1.02 | [MD-K p.5] |
| A-15-15 | Grooved round bar in torsion | τ0 = Tc/J, c = d/2, J = πd⁴/32 | Kts against r/d; D/d = 1.30, 1.05, 1.02 | [MD-K p.5] |
| A-15-16 | Round shaft with flat-bottom groove in bending and/or tension | σ0 = 4F/(πd²) + 32M/(πd³) | Kt against a/t (0.5–6.0, log); r/t = 0.03 … 1.00; Pilkey (1997), p. 115 | [MD-K p.6] |
| A-15-17 | Round shaft with flat-bottom groove in torsion | τ0 = 16T/(πd³) | Kts against a/t; r/t = 0.03, 0.04, 0.06, 0.10, 0.20; Pilkey (1997), p. 133 | [MD-K p.7] |
Table A-16. Approximate Kt for bending of a round bar or tube with a transverse round hole [MD-K p.8]
| a/D | A (d/D = 0.9) | Kt (0.9) | A (0.6) | Kt (0.6) | A (0) | Kt (0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.050 | 0.92 | 2.63 | 0.91 | 2.55 | 0.88 | 2.42 |
| 0.075 | 0.89 | 2.55 | 0.88 | 2.43 | 0.86 | 2.35 |
| 0.10 | 0.86 | 2.49 | 0.85 | 2.36 | 0.83 | 2.27 |
| 0.125 | 0.82 | 2.41 | 0.82 | 2.32 | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| 0.15 | 0.79 | 2.39 | 0.79 | 2.29 | 0.76 | 2.15 |
| 0.175 | 0.76 | 2.38 | 0.75 | 2.26 | 0.72 | 2.10 |
| 0.20 | 0.73 | 2.39 | 0.72 | 2.23 | 0.68 | 2.07 |
| 0.225 | 0.69 | 2.40 | 0.68 | 2.21 | 0.65 | 2.04 |
| 0.25 | 0.67 | 2.42 | 0.64 | 2.18 | 0.61 | 2.00 |
| 0.275 | 0.66 | 2.48 | 0.61 | 2.16 | 0.58 | 1.97 |
| 0.30 | 0.64 | 2.52 | 0.58 | 2.14 | 0.54 | 1.94 |
Table A-16 (continued). Approximate Kts for a round bar or tube with a transverse round hole in torsion [MD-K p.9]
| a/D | A (0.9) | Kts (0.9) | A (0.8) | Kts (0.8) | A (0.6) | Kts (0.6) | A (0.4) | Kts (0.4) | A (0) | Kts (0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.05 | 0.96 | 1.78 | 0.95 | 1.77 | ||||||
| 0.075 | 0.95 | 1.82 | 0.93 | 1.71 | ||||||
| 0.10 | 0.94 | 1.76 | 0.93 | 1.74 | 0.92 | 1.72 | 0.92 | 1.70 | 0.92 | 1.68 |
| 0.125 | 0.91 | 1.76 | 0.91 | 1.74 | 0.90 | 1.70 | 0.90 | 1.67 | 0.89 | 1.64 |
| 0.15 | 0.90 | 1.77 | 0.89 | 1.75 | 0.87 | 1.69 | 0.87 | 1.65 | 0.87 | 1.62 |
| 0.175 | 0.89 | 1.81 | 0.88 | 1.76 | 0.87 | 1.69 | 0.86 | 1.64 | 0.85 | 1.60 |
| 0.20 | 0.88 | 1.96 | 0.86 | 1.79 | 0.85 | 1.70 | 0.84 | 1.63 | 0.83 | 1.58 |
| 0.25 | 0.87 | 2.00 | 0.82 | 1.86 | 0.81 | 1.72 | 0.80 | 1.63 | 0.79 | 1.54 |
| 0.30 | 0.80 | 2.18 | 0.78 | 1.97 | 0.77 | 1.76 | 0.75 | 1.63 | 0.74 | 1.51 |
| 0.35 | 0.77 | 2.41 | 0.75 | 2.09 | 0.72 | 1.81 | 0.69 | 1.63 | 0.68 | 1.47 |
| 0.40 | 0.72 | 2.67 | 0.71 | 2.25 | 0.68 | 1.89 | 0.64 | 1.63 | 0.63 | 1.44 |
The solved questions come from four scanned files. [MD-IP] (14 pp, titled "مسأله مهمه", "important problem") is the Final 2023 Problem 3, typed statement plus handwritten solution signed "Sherif Ehab". [MD-R1] (11 pp) and [MD-R2] (4 pp) are final-review scans (CamScanner, 17-01-2025). [MD-REV] (24 pp, images cap/mdrev-001..024) holds the solved Final 2022 Problem 3 and a second Problem 3 (25 marks) whose year is not stated. All solutions are handwritten student solutions, so every final number is quoted as written; suspected errors are flagged (⚠ F22–F35), not corrected. Units are as in each exam (US units or SI). Page numbers are PDF page numbers of each file.
| ID | Exam | Marks | Topic | Where |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PQ1 | Final 2023, Problem 3 | 55 | Gear F drives gear C and a chain sprocket B on shaft ABCD: force P, bearing reactions, ball-bearing C10, gear teeth counts, module, AGMA spur bending and wear | [MD-IP p.1–14] |
| PQ2 | Final 2022–2023, Problem 2 | 20 | Cone clutch, uniform wear and uniform pressure | [MD-R1 p.1–3] |
| PQ3 | Final term exam 2023–2024 (1st term), Problem 1 | 60 | Countershaft (Shigley 3-83): force, reactions, two ball-bearing C10, interference, diametral pitch | [MD-R1 p.5–11] |
| PQ4 | Final 2022, Problem 3 (= Shigley 14-38 in SI) | 50 | Same countershaft in SI: forces, reactions, C10, gear B teeth and module, bending and wear factors of safety | [MD-REV p.1–11], textbook solution [MD-R1 p.4], [MD-R2 p.1–4] |
| PQ5 | Problem 3 (year not stated) | 25 | 18-tooth helical pinion on a motor shaft: forces, roller and angular-contact ball bearings, Lewis-type fatigue check | [MD-REV p.12–24] |
Handwritten remarks by the solver are given where legible; the Arabic remarks are translated (the scans are faint in places, see "unreadable or unclear" under each question).
Statement [MD-IP p.1–2]
Solution (as written)
Statement [MD-R1 p.1]: a cone clutch has D = 12 in, d = 11 in, w = 2.305 in and a coefficient of friction 0.281. A torque of 1.8 kip·in is to be transmitted. Estimate the actuating force and the maximum pressure by both models (uniform wear and uniform pressure). The page also carries Figure (1), an internal rim-type brake (dimensions in millimetres, with a handwritten "24°"), and Figure (2), the cone clutch with cup, cone, spring, splined output shaft, shifting groove, half-angle α, pressure p, dFn and dr/sin α; a handwritten "b = ??" is beside the statement (the source does not say what it refers to). Figure (1) is cut off and its dimensions are unreadable [MD-R1 p.1].
Solution (as written) [MD-R1 p.2–3]
Statement [MD-R1 p.4–5]
Solution (as written)
Statement [MD-REV p.1–2]
Solution by the student (Final 2022, "Qu. No. 3") [MD-REV p.3–11]
Textbook solution of the same problem (Shigley 14-38, SI) [MD-R2 p.1–4]
Statement [MD-REV p.12]
Solution (as written)
Flat-belt tensions and slip check [MD-2 p.12–24]
V-belt drive [MD-3 p.8–21]
Gear force components [MD-S4 p.2–6; MD-IP p.3, p.9; MD-REV p.13–14]
AGMA spur/helical factors of safety [MD-S5 p.1–11; SI form: MD-IP p.10–14, MD-REV p.6–11, MD-R2 p.2–4]
Drum-brake shoe (internal or external) [MD-6 p.18–28, p.40–41]
Disk clutch / annular-pad / cone [MD-6 p.52–53, p.59–60, p.72–73; cone example MD-R1 p.2–3]
Bearing C10 with reliability, and life [MD-7 p.13–28, p.37–39; MD-IP p.7, MD-R1 p.9–10, MD-REV p.4–5, p.17–21]
Marin-corrected endurance limit and fatigue safety factor [MD-F p.1–6; tooth example MD-REV p.22–24]
Shaft bearing reactions, two planes [MD-IP p.4–6, MD-R1 p.7–8, MD-REV p.3–4, p.14–16]
Minimum pinion teeth without interference and module [MD-IP p.8, MD-R1 p.10, MD-REV p.5]
F1 [MD-2 p.19]: the highlighted box prints "Ha = Hnom Ks nd".
F2 [MD-2 p.29–30]: T is computed as 82.5 N·m, but the next line uses 2(82)/0.15 = 1093.3 N.
F3 [MD-3 p.10]: Table 17-12 (SI), section A, 85 mm, 20 m/s is printed as 1.64.
F4 [MD-3 p.10]: the table title says "Horsepower Ratings", but the SI speed columns are in m/s and no power unit is printed. Example 17-4 uses the values as kW [MD-3 p.26–27].
F5 [MD-3 p.26]: Htab is interpolated at V = 17 m/s (3.506 kW), but V = π(0.188)(1750/60) = 17.23 m/s.
F6 [MD-2 p.24]: step 3 prints T = 63 025 Hnom Ks nd/n (US: lbf·in, hp, rpm) next to the boxed T = Hnom Ks nd/(2πn).
F7 [MD-6 p.79]: Ex 16-5 gives the rotary inertia as "289 lbm·in·s".
F8 [MD-6 p.49]: the single-plate clutch sketch labels the friction surface "μs = 1.6".
F9 [MD-S4 p.22–23], P13-57 worm (moment equation): the i-component of R_G × W is written as −287 350 − 149 466.
F10 [MD-S5 p.12–13], P14-20(b): Pd/F = 0.8 is solved while keeping Wt = 787.8 lbf, Kv, Ks and Km at their Pd = 6, F = 2 in values. But Wt = 33 000H/V and V ∝ dP = 16/Pd, so Wt changes with Pd.
F11 [MD-4 p.34–35, p.41]: example labels are inconsistent. The 17T/34T helical example starts as "Example 13-3" (p.34), but its continuation (p.35) is titled "Example 13-2". The 30:1 gear-train example (p.41) is also titled "Example 13-3".
F12 [MD-S5 p.14]: helical Cpf is written as 2/(10 × 3.097) − 0.0375 + 0.0125 × 2 = 0.0525; the pinion diameter is 3.079 in.
F13 [MD-1 p.11]: in Table 1-2 the rows starting 3-85 and 3-87 both end with "13-48".
F14 [MD-41 p.53], Ex 13-8: the axial force is printed as "Wa = Wt tan φ cos Γ = 1865 tan 20° sin 71.6° = 644 N".
F15 [MD-41 p.63–64], Ex 13-9: the scalar solution prints T = 128(62.3/2) = 3982 N·mm, but the vector solution on the next page gives the i-component 3987 (T = 4 kN·mm).
F16 [MD-5 p.12, p.15], Ex 14-2: the surface factor is computed as ka = 2.70(55)^−0.265 = 0.934 (p.12), but the Marin product on p.15 uses 0.838: Se = 0.838(0.948)(1)(1)(1)1.66(27.5) = 36.3 kpsi.
F17 [MD-5 p.23–24], Ex 14-3: the statement gives a tangential load of 382 lbf, but the substitution in Eq (14-14) uses 380.
F18 [MD-5 p.86–87], Ex 14-5: the gear radius is written rG = 6.004/2 = 3.002 in (dG was 6.005 in on p.85) and (rb)G = 2.767 in, but Eq (14-25) is evaluated with 3.004 and 2.769.
F19 [MD-S1 p.10–11], P17-4: the width is printed as b = 5.6 in.
F20 [MD-4 p.9 = MD-41 p.9 against MD-S3 p.8], Table 13-4: the lecture slide prints the normal arc tooth thickness as π/Pn − Bn/2, while the section handout prints π/(2Pn) − Bn/2.
F21 [MD-IMP p.1 against MD-1 p.3]: the student note says the course is out of 150 marks (50 coursework + 100 final), while the Design (2) syllabus slide gives CW 50 (50%) + FE 50 (50%) = 100.
F22 [MD-IP p.6–7], PQ1(c): the ensemble reliability of four bearings is solved as R = (0.8145)^(1/4) = 0.90249 ≈ 0.9025, then the C10 line uses (1 − 0.9025).
F23 [MD-IP p.11], PQ1(g): Kv is computed as (A + √(200V))/A = 1.26 with the exponent B = 0.825 missing.
F24 [MD-IP p.14], PQ1(h): the contact stress is printed as σc = 191 × 1869.38 √(N/m²) → 357.05 MPa, but the printed factors give a smaller root.
F25 [MD-R1 p.2], PQ2 uniform wear: the substitution prints (12² − 1²) = 143 where the formula needs (D² − d²) = 12² − 11² = 23.
F26 [MD-R1 p.9–10], PQ3(c): the reliability term is evaluated as (1 − R) = (1 − 0.95), while [MD-REV] uses ln(1/R); [MD-IP p.7] also uses (1 − R).
F27 [MD-REV p.4–5], PQ4(b), (c): the bearing totals mix components. FO,tot = √(5.08² + 8.3189²) = 9.747 kN combines Oy with Cy, and FC,tot = √(0.49² + 10.83²) = 10.841 kN combines Oz with Cz.
F28 [MD-REV p.7], PQ4(f): Kv = (59.7776 + √(200 × 14.137))/59.7776 = 1.89 omits the exponent B = 0.8254; [MD-R2 p.2] applies it and gets 1.69.
F29 [MD-REV p.9], PQ4(f): YN = 1.3558(648 × 10⁶)^−0.0178 is printed as 1.95; the value is 0.945 (with the printed −0.0178, [MD-R2 p.3] reads YN = 0.9 from Fig 14-14). KR uses 0.079 (0.967) where [MD-R2 p.3] uses 0.0759 (0.955).
F30 [MD-R2 p.2 against MD-REV p.10], PQ4: the geometry factor I. [MD-REV p.10] uses φt = 25° for gear B (I = cos 25° sin 25°/2 × 5/6 = 0.1596, printed 0.1595 / 0.1593); [MD-R2 p.2] uses 20° (I = cos 20° sin 20°/2 × 5/6 = 0.134) although Wt = FB cos 25°.
F31 [MD-R2 p.1–2 against MD-R1 p.4], PQ4: the textbook statement (Shigley 14-38) says "20° spur gears" and the US figure has FB at 20°, but the solution works in SI with φ = 25° for gear B (as in the exam figure [MD-REV p.2]) and with d = 300 mm; the US figure shows gear B of 8 in (203 mm).
F32 [MD-REV p.13–16], PQ5(a): the tangential load is printed as Wt = 40.493 lbf, but every later step uses 41.193 lbf.
F33 [MD-REV p.17–21], PQ5(b), (c): bearing selection.
F34 [MD-REV p.23–24], PQ5(d): fatigue.
F35 [MD-REV p.17], PQ5(b): the cylindrical roller bearing at B is rated with the manufacturer 1 parameters (LR = 90 × 10⁶, x0 = 0, θ = 4.48, b = 1.5, a = 10/3).
md-belt-open-geometry.jpg: open-belt geometry with θd, θD, C and the ½√(4C² − (D − d)²) span (Fig 17-1a); 700 × 507 px [MD-2 p.9].md-helical-force-components.jpg: helical-tooth force W resolved into Wt, Wr, Wa with φn, φt and ψ; 660 × 610 px [MD-S4 p.4].md-bearing-nomenclature.jpg: ball-bearing nomenclature (Fig 11-1); 700 × 609 px [MD-7 p.2].md2-2023-gear-sprocket-assembly.jpg: Final 2023 Problem 3, shaft ABCD with sprocket B, gear C, bearings A and D, gear F on shaft EFG, and the end view with a = 150, b = 250, c = 125 mm; 740 × 340 px [MD-IP p.2].md2-2022-countershaft.jpg: Final 2022 Problem 3, Figure (4) shaft 2 with FA = 11 kN at 20°, FB at 25°, gears A (600 mm) and B (300 mm), 400/350/300 mm spacings, 50-mm shaft, bearings O and C; 730 × 540 px [MD-REV p.2].Every source below is a file in src/ (or page images in cap/); the tag in brackets is the label used at the end of each line, followed by the PDF page. Lecture titles and lecturers are as printed on the first page.
Lectures (Prof. Dr. Mohamed Agwa, 1444/2022-2023; the slides follow Shigley)
1a5vqAM5Jorx… (Lecture_1.pdf). Section 1.1enCs_2M6f… (Lecture_2.pdf). Section 2.1hS2fiTToo… (Lecture_3.pdf). Section 3.1CTTi5ywom… (Lecture_4.pdf). Section 4.14_HMJ1lMk… (Lecture_6-1.pdf). Section 8.10KnbxH2IJ… (Lecture_7.1.pdf). Section 9.Section handouts (Eng. Ehsan Khaled) and problem sheets
1gEACIJfxX…. Section 2.7.1sFPIFXE4N…. Section 3.8.1nr7GTVVRI…. Section 3.8.1sFctVNTA0…. Section 4.6.1sGjIpjaZD…. Section 5.1yYHXoi_3u…. Section 7.1lGEaYNffd…. Section 3.9.1lK4CYLiku3…. Section 2.8.10Co6vpKSL…. Section 4.7.Reference tables
1Sj_uelAGw…. Section 10.1GXx3f8UsH…. Section 11.Advice note and solved past-exam material
17W6YRrNGc…. Section 1.4.1MbQ6AtKUX…. Section 12.2.1N2Zlo2Zc_…. Sections 12.3–12.4.1N40x4v9nC…. Section 12.5.cap/mdrev-001.jpg … mdrev-024.jpg, 24 page images: the Final 2022 Problem 3 (pp. 1–11) and a second 25-mark Problem 3 (pp. 12–24), solved by hand. Sections 12.5–12.6.Every line is taken from the source named in its tag. Page numbers are PDF page numbers (for [MC-MID] the number of the captured image cap/mcmid-NNN.jpg); the slide decks have no printed page numbers. Nothing is added from memory. Where the sources say nothing, the notes say so (see "Not covered by the sources"). Suspected source errors are not corrected in place; they are listed under ⚠ Flags. Several worked examples are copied from textbooks and keep their equation, table and example numbers ("Equation 2.6", "Table 2.1", "Example 2.3/2.7/2.9", "Table 21.2", "Example 9.1"); those numbers refer to the books, not to the lecture slides. Where two sources contain the same fact, the tags are joined in one line; where they differ in numbers or method, both versions are kept and marked.
Layout: 1 fundamentals; 2 chip formation; 3 tool geometry; 4 forces, Merchant, power; 5 operations and machine tools (turning, facing, drilling, milling, other machines); 6 cutting temperature; 7 tool wear and tool life; 8 tool materials, surface finish, economics (coverage note); 9 exam and oral questions. Then Calculator candidates, ⚠ Flags and Worked-example checks.
| Single point | Multi point |
|---|---|
| one main cutting edge, continuously in contact with the work | more than one (up to hundreds) edges; two-edged cutters are usually also counted as multi-point |
| e.g. turning, shaping, planing, slotting, boring tools | e.g. milling cutters, drills, reamers, saws |
| edge prepared by grinding | — |
| low MRR and productivity | high MRR and productivity |
| simple design and fabrication, comparatively low cost | complicated design and fabrication, comparatively high cost |
| Orthogonal metal cutting | Oblique metal cutting |
|---|---|
| Cutting edge perpendicular to the direction of tool travel | Edge inclined at an angle less than 90° to the direction of tool travel |
| Chip flows perpendicular to the cutting edge | Chip flows on the tool face making an angle |
| Chip coils in a tight flat spiral | Chip flows sideways in a long curl |
| For the same feed and depth, the shearing force acts on a smaller area, so tool life is less | Cutting force acts on a larger area, so tool life is more |
| Produces sharp corners | Produces a chamfer at the end of the cut |
| Smaller length of cutting edge in contact with the work | For the same depth of cut, greater length of edge in contact |
| Generally parting-off on the lathe, broaching and slotting | Used in almost all machining operations |
Recommended values [MC-1 p.2]:
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Nose radius | As large as possible |
| Front relief (clearance) | 4 to 8 |
| Side relief (clearance) | 6 to 10 |
| Side rake, hard and/or abrasive work | 2 to 10 |
| Side rake, soft and/or gummy work | 10 to 22 |
| Back rake, hard/or abrasive work | Negative to 0 |
| Back rake, soft and/or gummy work | 0 to 10 Positive |
| Material | Top rake | Side clearance |
|---|---|---|
| Aluminium | 15°–20° | 10°–15° |
| Brass | 10°–12° | 8°–10° |
| Mild steel | 8°–10° | 7°–9° |
| Stainless steel | 6°–7° | 6°–7° |
| Cast iron | 7°–9° | 7°–9° |
Effects of the side cutting edge angle (lead angle) [MC-1 p.12–13]:
| Case (DOC, feed, speed) | F_X radial (N) | F_Y feed (N) | F_Z tangential (N) | F_ZC calc (N) | Accuracy % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roughing: 5.08 mm, 0.51 mm/rev, 244 m/min | 887.13 / 919.39 / 958.56 | 2,309.42 / 2,219.69 / 2,247.57 | 5,358.77 / 5,119.33 / 5,113.66 | 5,215.18 | 97.3 / 98.2 / 98.1 |
| Semifinishing: 3.81 mm, 0.38 mm/rev, 274 m/min | 556.12 / 576.00 / 600.88 | 1,479.75 / 1,482.56 / 1,507.77 | 3,060.21 / 3,038.97 / 3,063.95 | 3,009.09 | 98.3 / 99.0 / 98.2 |
| Finishing: 2.03 mm, 0.20 mm/rev, 305 m/min | 234.86 / 236.17 / 240.11 | 491.08 / 483.72 / 496.01 | 957.37 / 941.74 / 957.27 | 979.50 | 97.7 / 96.1 / 97.7 |
(Imperial DOC/feed/speed: 0.200″, 0.020 ipr, 800 sfm; 0.150″, 0.015 ipr, 900 sfm; 0.080″, 0.008 ipr, 1,000 sfm. Values in lb are also printed [MC-1 p.10].)
| Material | Brinell | U (N·m/mm³) | U (in·lb/in³) | HPu (hp/(in³/min)) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon steel | 150–200 | 1.6 | 240,000 | 0.6 |
| 201–250 | 2.2 | 320,000 | 0.8 | |
| 251–300 | 2.8 | 400,000 | 1.0 | |
| Alloy steels | 200–250 | 2.2 | 320,000 | 0.8 |
| 251–300 | 2.8 | 400,000 | 1.0 | |
| 301–350 | 3.6 | 520,000 | 1.3 | |
| 351–400 | 4.4 | 640,000 | 1.6 | |
| Cast irons | 125–175 | 1.1 | 160,000 | 0.4 |
| 175–250 | 1.6 | 240,000 | 0.6 | |
| Stainless steel | 150–250 | 2.8 | 400,000 | 1.0 |
| Aluminum | 50–100 | 0.7 | 100,000 | 0.25 |
| Aluminum alloys | 100–150 | 0.8 | 120,000 | 0.3 |
| Brass | 100–150 | 2.2 | 320,000 | 0.8 |
| Bronze | 100–150 | 2.2 | 320,000 | 0.8 |
| Magnesium alloys | 50–100 | 0.4 | 60,000 | 0.15 |
| Material | Hardness | hp: sharp | hp: dull | kW: sharp | kW: dull |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon, alloy and tool steels | 85–200 HB | 0.98 | 1.24 | 0.044 | 0.057 |
| 35–40 HRC | 1.24 | 1.51 | 0.057 | 0.068 | |
| 40–50 HRC | 1.33 | 1.69 | 0.060 | 0.076 | |
| 50–55 HRC | 1.78 | 2.22 | 0.081 | 0.101 | |
| 55–58 HRC | 3.02 | 3.73 | 0.138 | 0.170 | |
| Ferritic, austenitic, martensitic stainless | 135–275 HB | 1.15 | 1.42 | 0.052 | 0.065 |
| 30–45 HRC | 1.24 | 1.51 | 0.057 | 0.068 | |
| Precipitation-hardening stainless | 150–450 HB | 1.24 | 1.51 | 0.057 | 0.068 |
| Material | kW/(cm³/min) | HP/(in³/min) |
|---|---|---|
| Cast irons | 0.044–0.08 | 0.97–1.76 |
| Steels: soft | 0.05–0.066 | 1.10–1.45 |
| Steels: 0 < R_c < 45 | 0.065–0.09 | 1.43–1.98 |
| Steels: 50 < R_c < 60 | 0.09–0.2 | 1.98–4.40 |
| Stainless steels | 0.055–0.09 | 1.21–1.98 |
| Magnesium alloys | 0.007–0.009 | 0.15–0.20 |
| Titanium | 0.053–0.066 | 1.16–1.45 |
| Aluminum alloys | 0.012–0.022 | 0.26–0.48 |
| High temperature alloys (Ni and Co based) | 0.09–0.15 | 1.98–3.30 |
| Free-machining brass | 0.056–0.07 | 1.23–1.54 |
| Copper alloys: R_B < 80 | 0.027–0.04 | 0.59–0.88 |
| Copper alloys: 80 < R_B < 100 | 0.04–0.057 | 0.88–1.25 |
| Material | W·s/mm³ | hp·min/in³ |
|---|---|---|
| Aluminum alloys | 0.4–1.1 | 0.15–0.4 |
| Cast irons | 1.6–5.5 | 0.6–2.0 |
| Copper alloys | 1.4–3.3 | 0.5–1.2 |
| High-temperature alloys | 3.3–8.5 | 1.2–3.1 |
| Magnesium alloys | 0.4–0.6 | 0.15–0.2 |
| Nickel alloys | 4.9–6.8 | 1.8–2.5 |
| Refractory alloys | 3.8–9.6 | 1.1–3.5 |
| Stainless steels | 3.0–5.2 | 1.1–1.9 |
| Steels | 2.7–9.3 | 1.0–3.4 |
| Titanium alloys | 3.0–4.1 | 1.1–1.5 |
The file title says "orthogonal cutting", but its content is the slideway analysis (see Sources). Set-up (figure) [MC-P p.1]:
| Aspect | Down milling | Up milling |
|---|---|---|
| Cutter rotation direction | Same as the feed direction | Opposite to the feed direction |
| Chip thickness | Starts thick and decreases gradually | Starts thin and increases gradually |
| Tool life | Long | Short |
Peripheral milling: chip geometry [MC-3 p.3–5]
| Shaper | Planer | Slotter | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cutting motion | reciprocating motion of the tool (work stationary) | reciprocating motion of the W.P. (tool stationary) | up-and-down motion of the cutting tool |
| Feed motion (as printed) | reciprocating motion of the W.P. (Arabic: الحركة العرضية للشغلة) | reciprocating motion of the tool (Arabic: الحركة العرضية للقلم) | reciprocating motion of the W.P. (Arabic: الحركة العرضية للشغلة) |
| Job size | small W.P | large W.P | slots in small W.P |
| Cutting tools | one tool at a time | several tools at the same time | one tool at a time |
| Rigidity | less rigidity | high rigidity and accuracy | less rigidity |
| Work material | Brinell hardness (HBN) | Tool–chip temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|
| Aluminum alloy | 100 | 400 |
| Brittle gray cast iron | 200 | 750 |
| Ductile mild steel | 200 | 1000 |
| Property | Aluminum | Copper | Steel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thermal conductivity (W/m·K) | 225.94 | 397.48 | 57.739 |
| Thermal diffusivity (mm²/s) | 91 | 116 | 16.5 |
| Specific heat capacity (J/kg·K) | 921 | 385 | 448 (printed "J/k*K") |
| Thermal effusivity (W·s^0.5/(m²·K)) | 23,688 | 36,983 | 14,236 |
| Density (kg/m³) | 2698 | 8940 | 7840 |
| Material | ρ (g/cm³) | ρ (lb/in³) | α (°C⁻¹ × 10⁻⁶) | α (°F⁻¹ × 10⁻⁶) | T_m (°C) | T_m (°F) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aluminum | 2.70 | 0.098 | 24 | 13.3 | 660 | 1220 |
| Copper | 8.97 | 0.324 | 17 | 9.4 | 1083 | 1981 |
| Iron | 7.87 | 0.284 | 12.1 | 6.7 | 1539 | 2802 |
| Lead | 11.35 | 0.410 | 29 | 16.1 | 327 | 621 |
| Magnesium | 1.74 | 0.063 | 26 | 14.4 | 650 | 1202 |
| Nickel | 8.92 | 0.322 | 13.3 | 7.4 | 1455 | 2651 |
| Steel | 7.87 | 0.284 | 12 | 6.7 | a | a |
| Tin | 7.31 | 0.264 | 23 | 12.7 | 232 | 449 |
| Tungsten | 19.30 | 0.697 | 4.0 | 2.2 | 3410 | 6170 |
| Zinc | 7.15 | 0.258 | 40 | 22.2 | 420 | 787 |
| Glass | 2.5 | 0.090 | 1.8–9.0 | 1.0–5.0 | b | b |
| Alumina | 3.8 | 0.137 | 9.0 | 5.0 | NA | NA |
| Silica | 2.66 | 0.096 | NA | NA | b | b |
| Phenol resins | 1.3 | 0.047 | 60 | 33 | c | c |
| Nylon | 1.16 | 0.042 | 100 | 55 | b | b |
| Teflon | 2.2 | 0.079 | 100 | 55 | b | b |
| Natural rubber | 1.2 | 0.043 | 80 | 45 | b | b |
| Polyethylene (low density) | 0.92 | 0.033 | 180 | 100 | b | b |
| Polystyrene | 1.05 | 0.038 | 60 | 33 | b | b |
Footnotes: a melting characteristics of steel depend on composition; b softens at elevated temperature, no well-defined melting point; c chemically degrades at high temperature; NA not available [MC-U22 p.15].
| Material | Specific heat | k (J/s·mm·°C) | k (Btu/hr·in·°F) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aluminum | 0.21 | 0.22 | 9.75 |
| Cast iron | 0.11 | 0.06 | 2.7 |
| Copper | 0.092 | 0.40 | 18.7 |
| Iron | 0.11 | 0.072 | 2.98 |
| Lead | 0.031 | 0.033 | 1.68 |
| Magnesium | 0.25 | 0.16 | 7.58 |
| Nickel | 0.105 | 0.070 | 2.88 |
| Steel | 0.11 | 0.046 | 2.20 |
| Stainless steel (austenitic 18-8) | 0.11 | 0.014 | 0.67 |
| Tin | 0.054 | 0.062 | 3.0 |
| Zinc | 0.091 | 0.112 | 5.41 |
| Alumina | 0.18 | 0.029 | 1.4 |
| Concrete | 0.2 | 0.012 | 0.6 |
| Phenolics | 0.4 | 0.00016 | 0.0077 |
| Polyethylene | 0.5 | 0.00034 | 0.016 |
| Teflon | 0.25 | 0.00020 | 0.0096 |
| Natural rubber | 0.48 | 0.00012 | 0.006 |
| Water (liquid) | 1.00 | 0.0006 | 0.029 |
| Ice | 0.46 | 0.0023 | 0.11 |
mc2-tool-wear-curve.jpg) [MC-U23 p.26].The three finals below are handwritten reviews signed "Sherif Ehab". The question statements are mostly not reproduced; the answers are, so the questions are reconstructed from the answers and marked as such. Where an item is marked "مذكور في" (mentioned/covered in), the answer is in another file of the set or in a file that is not in the set (⚠ F48).
| Source | m | K | Equation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lecture Solved Problem 01 [MC-U22 p.12] | 0.377 (printed 0.38) | 83 | T = 83 v^0.38 |
| Final 2022–2023 [MC-F23 p.3] | 0.38 | 83.5 | T = 83.5 V^0.38 |
| Final 2023–2024 [MC-F24 p.5] | 0.377 | 85 | T = 85 V^0.377 |
| Student review [MC-RT p.7] | 0.38 | 85 | T = 85 V^0.38 |
The three versions use the same data (120 → 515 °C, 160 → 570 °C, 180 → 600 °C). The differences come from rounding m (⚠ F41).
| Topic | Where it appears |
|---|---|
| Trigger equation problem (three points, solve for K and m) | [MC-U22 pp.11–12], [MC-RT p.7], [MC-F23 p.3], [MC-F24 p.5] |
| Cook equation problem (steel, 3 m/s) | [MC-G12 p.47], [MC-U22 p.19], [MC-RT p.8] |
| Taylor equation from data; life change for a speed change | [MC-U23 pp.32–37], [MC-RT pp.13–15], [MC-F23 pp.4–5], [MC-F24 pp.7–8] |
| Flank wear vs crater wear | [MC-U23 pp.4–5], [MC-F24 p.6], [MC-F22 p.4] |
| Tool wear mechanisms (adhesion, abrasion, diffusion, oxidation, chemical); which dominates at high speed | [MC-U23 pp.15–22], [MC-RW1 pp.1–3], [MC-RW2 pp.1–4] |
| True/false on cutting temperature (heat flux, nose radius, hardness, rake angle) | [MC-F22 pp.1–2], [MC-F23 pp.1–2] |
| Factors affecting the cutting temperature | [MC-U21 pp.11–13], [MC-U22 p.9], [MC-F22 pp.2–3] |
| Effects of cutting temperature, heat zones, thermocouple measurement | [MC-U21 pp.3, 7], [MC-F24 pp.3–4] |
| Turning numerical (MRR, power, torque, a, L) | [MC-1 pp.19–21], [MC-F24 pp.2–3] |
| Uncut chip thickness and engagement length derivation | [MC-2 p.1], [MC-F24 p.1] |
| Chip thinning in face milling | [MC-3 pp.15–16], [MC-F24 p.1] |
| Orthogonal model, shear angle and strain, effect of a large shear angle | [MC-G1 p.5], [MC-GQD pp.1–3], [MC-GQO p.3] |
| Orthogonal-cutting power example (stainless steel, 200 HB) | [MC-G12 p.41], [MC-GQD p.4] |
| Types of milling and of operations related to drilling, with sketches | [MC-GQD pp.5–8], [MC-G41 pp.4–12] |
| Cutting fluid (asked in the finals, no source in the set) | [MC-F23 p.2], [MC-F22 p.4] |
Study advice from a previous student, not course content; recorded because a TA may find it useful context.
Each flag gives what the source says, what I believe is correct, and a one-line check.
After pass 2 the following are still missing from the files supplied; add the lectures when available rather than filling them in from other books.
mc2-tool-wear-curve.jpg (800×648): flank wear vs time: initial wear, steady wear, severe wear [MC-U23 p.26].mc2-forces-on-chip.jpg (800×284): Fig. 1.6, (a) forces acting on the chip in orthogonal cutting (F, N, R, Fs, Fn, R′, α, β, φ) and (b) forces on the tool that can be measured (Fc, Ft, R″) [MC-G1 p.6].mc2-merchant-circle.jpg (405×362): Fig. 1.7, Merchant's force circle relating F, N, Fs, Fn, Fc, Ft and R (= R′ = R″) with α, β, φ and β − α [MC-G1 p.6].Lecturer names are those of the Drive folders: Dr. Ahmed Ibrahim (Unit 1 and Unit 2 lecture files), Dr. Ahmed El-Gohary (folders "محاضرات د/احمد الجوهري" and "اسئله د/احمد الجوهري"), Eng. Ahmed El-Saidy (section notes). [MC-IMP] names "Dr. Ahmed Shaker" and "Dr. Ahmed Ibrahim" as the two lecturers of the course; it does not name El-Gohary, so the notes do not assume that Shaker and El-Gohary are the same person.
Dr. Ahmed Ibrahim, Unit 1 (turning, drilling, milling)
Dr. Ahmed Ibrahim, Unit 2 (cutting temperature, tool wear and tool life)
Dr. Ahmed El-Gohary (lectures)
Dr. Ahmed El-Gohary (questions)
Student and section notes
The vibration notes were written from three groups of files and are merged here under one outline. Each section shows what every group says; a group with nothing on the topic is left out. Every line ends with the tag of its source file and the PDF page. Flags are prefixed with the group letter (A-F1, B-F1, C-F1).
Suspected errors in the sources are kept as printed and marked ⚠.
| # | Loading type | Model |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cantilever, end load P, length L | K = 3EI/L³ |
| 2 | Bar, axial load P, length L | K = EA/L |
| 3 | Simply supported beam, central load P, span L | K = 48EI/L³ |
| 4 | Shaft, end torque T, length L | Kt = GJ/L |
| Element | Stiffness | Remarks (as printed) |
|---|---|---|
| Helical spring | K = Gd⁴/(8nD³) | G = shear modulus, n = number of turns |
| Torsional (spiral) spring | K = EI/L | I = moment of inertia of the cross-section, E = modulus of elasticity, L = total length |
| "Parallel spring" (drawn k1–k2 end to end) | K = K1 + K2 | "Equivalent resistance in series" (⚠ A-F6) |
| "Series springs" (drawn side by side) | 1/K = 1/K1 + 1/K2 | "Equivalent resistance in parallel" (⚠ A-F6) |
| Axial loading | K = EA/L | E = σ/ε = (F/A)/(ΔL/L) (printed "E = σ/E"); F = (EA/L)ΔL = KΔL |
| Torsional loading | K = GIp/L | Ip = πd⁴/32, polar moment of inertia |
| Cantilever (load at tip) | K = 3EI/L³ | I = πd⁴/64, second moment of area |
| Simply supported beam (central load) | K = 48EI/L³ | K at the position of the load |
| Buoyancy | Keq = ρgA | F = ρgV = ρgAx [VA-CH p.29] |
| Pendulum (gravity) | Geq = mgL | I0θ̈ + mgLθ = 0 [VA-CH p.30] |
| Case | ζ | Roots | Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Underdamped | ζ < 1 | −ζωn ± i√(1−ζ²)ωn | X e^(−ζωn t) sin(ωd t + φ) — decaying oscillation |
| Critically damped | ζ = 1 | −ωn (double) | e^(−ωn t)(A + Bt) — no oscillation |
| Overdamped | ζ > 1 | −ζωn ± √(ζ²−1)ωn (real) | e^(−ζωn t)(A e^(√(ζ²−1)ωn t) + B e^(−√(ζ²−1)ωn t)) — no oscillation |
| Solid | Volume / CG | Moments of inertia (about the axes through G unless primed) |
|---|---|---|
| Sphere | V = (4/3)πr³ | Ixx = Iyy = Izz = (2/5)mr² |
| Hemisphere | V = (2/3)πr³; G at (3/8)r from the flat face | Ixx = Iyy = 0.259 mr², Izz = (2/5)mr² |
| Thin circular disc | — | Ixx = Iyy = (1/4)mr², Izz = (1/2)mr², Iz′z′ = (3/2)mr² |
| Thin ring | — | Ixx = Iyy = (1/2)mr², Izz = mr² |
| Cylinder | V = πr²h; G at h/2 | Ixx = Iyy = (1/12)m(3r² + h²), Izz = (1/2)mr² |
| Cone | V = (1/3)πr²h; G at h/4 from the base | Ixx = Iyy = (3/80)m(4r² + h²), Izz = (3/10)mr² |
| Thin plate a × b | — | Ixx = (1/12)mb², Iyy = (1/12)ma², Izz = (1/12)m(a² + b²) |
| Slender rod, length ℓ | G at ℓ/2 | Ixx = Iyy = (1/12)mℓ², Ix′x′ = Iy′y′ = (1/3)mℓ² (about the end), Iz′z′ = 0 |
| Case | Quantity | Formula | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harmonic force F0 sin ωt | X/X0, X0 = F0/K | 1/D; φ = tan⁻¹(2ζr/(1 − r²)) | [VA-BK p.87–88] |
| Resonance (r = 1) | X_res/X0; ζ from test | 1/(2ζ); ζ = X0/(2X_res); φ = 90° | [VA-BK p.89] |
| Peak of X/X0 | ωp/ωn; Xp/X0 | √(1 − 2ζ²); 1/(2ζ√(1 − ζ²)); exists for ζ < 0.707 | [VA-BK p.89] |
| Rotating unbalance | MX/(me) | r²/D; peak at ωp/ωn = 1/√(1 − 2ζ²), MXp/me = 1/(2ζ√(1 − ζ²)) | [VA-BK p.92–93] |
| Whirling shaft | r/e | r²/D (same form); Kr/2 per bearing | [VA-BK p.103–106] |
| Moving support (transmissibility) | X/Y | √(1 + (2ζr)²)/D | [VA-BK p.96–97] |
| Force transmitted to foundation | TR = FT0/F0 | √(1 + (2ζr)²)/D | [VA-BK p.100] |
| Seismic instrument | Z/X = M.F | r²/D; φ = tan⁻¹(2ζr/(1 − r²)) | [VA-BK p.109] |
| Undamped force on cam/relay term i | Yi | (Fi/k)/(1 − (iω/ωn)²) (undamped), damped: (Fi/k)/√((1 − (iω/ωn)²)² + (2ζ iω/ωn)²) | [VA-BK p.108, 122–126] |
| Range of r = ω/ωn | Behaviour of TR |
|---|---|
| r = 0 and r = √2 | TR = 1 (FT0 = F0) for every ζ |
| 0 < r < √2 | TR > 1 (undesired); TR falls as ζ increases; for 0 < r < 1 TR rises with r, for 1 < r < √2 it falls with r |
| r > √2 | TR < 1 (desired), but TR rises with ζ — avoid extra damping |
| Instrument | Condition | Output | Percentage error | Useful range (ζ = 0.7) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vibrometer (seismometer) | ω/ωn ≫ 1 (large m, small k, ωn small) | Z/X ≅ 1 (mass stationary) | e% = 100(1 − M.F) | ω/ωn > 2.5 |
| Accelerometer | ω/ωn ≪ 1 (ωn large, m small) | Z/X ≅ (ω/ωn)², Z ≅ acceleration/ωn² | e% = 100(1 − (ωn²/ω²) M.F) | ω/ωn < 0.4 |
| Item | Relation |
|---|---|
| Main-mass amplitude | X1/X0 = (1 − (ω/ω22)²)/[(1 + k2/k1 − (ω/ω11)²)(1 − (ω/ω22)²) − k2/k1], X0 = F0/k1 |
| Absorber mass amplitude | X2/X0 = 1/[same bracket] |
| Tuned absorber | ω = ω22 → X1 = 0, x2 = −(F0/k2) sin ωt, k2x2 = −F0 sin ωt |
| Product of roots | (ωn1/ω22)²(ωn2/ω22)² = (ω11/ω22)² |
| Sum of roots | (ωn1/ω22)² + (ωn2/ω22)² = 1 + (1 + μ)(ω22/ω11)²² |
| Design for ω = ω11 = ω22 | (ωn1/ω22)² + (ωn2/ω22)² = 2 + μ; ωn1·ωn2 = ω22²; M2 = μM1; k2 = ω22²M2 |
| System | M | K | ωn |
|---|---|---|---|
| Two masses, three springs k (walls at both ends) | diag(m, m) | [[2k, −k],[−k, 2k]] | √(k/m), √(3k/m); modes {1, 1}, {1, −1} |
| Coupled pendulums (spring at a) | diag(mL², mL²) | [[mgL + ka², −ka²],[−ka², mgL + ka²]] | √(g/L), √(g/L + 2ka²/(mL²)); modes {1, 1}, {1, −1} |
| Half car (a, b) | diag(m, I) | [[k1 + k2, −(k1a − k2b)],[−(k1a − k2b), k1a² + k2b²]] | (not solved) |
| Disc + pendulum (Lagrange) | [[(3/2)M + m, mL],[mL, mL²]] | diag(k, mgL) | (not solved; damping c on x only) |
Source: [VB-TB] "Tables.pdf", 7 pages: pp.1–2 "Equivalent Masses, Springs and Dampers"; p.3 "Geometric Properties of Line and Area Elements"; p.4 "Center of Gravity and Mass Moment of Inertia of Homogeneous Solids"; pp.5–7 "Appendix A – Mathematical Relations and Material Properties" (textbook pages 1092–1094; p.5 opens with a biographical paragraph on Robert Hooke). The diagrams are not redrawn here; the description column names each case. Formulas are as printed.
| Case | Equivalent mass |
|---|---|
| Mass M attached at the end of a spring of mass m | meq = M + m/3 |
| Cantilever beam of mass m carrying an end mass M | meq = M + (33/140) m |
| Simply supported beam of mass m carrying a mass M at the middle | meq = M + 0.5 m |
| Coupled translational and rotational masses (mass m on a rack, gear of inertia J0, radius R) | meq = m + J0/R² ; Jeq = J0 + mR² |
| Masses m1, m2, m3 on a hinged bar at distances l1, l2, l3 | meq1 = m1 + (l2/l1)² m2 + (l3/l1)² m3 |
| Case | keq | Tag |
|---|---|---|
| Rod under axial load (l = length, A = cross-sectional area) | EA/l | [VB-TB p.1] |
| Tapered rod under axial load (D, d = end diameters) | πEDd/(4l) | [VB-TB p.1] |
| Helical spring under axial load (d = wire diameter, D = mean coil diameter, n = number of active turns) | Gd⁴/(8nD³) | [VB-TB p.1] |
| Fixed-fixed beam with load at the middle | 192EI/l³ | [VB-TB p.1] |
| Cantilever beam with end load | 3EI/l³ | [VB-TB p.2] |
| Simply supported beam with load at the middle | 48EI/l³ | [VB-TB p.2] |
| Springs in series | 1/keq = 1/k1 + 1/k2 + … + 1/kn | [VB-TB p.2] |
| Springs in parallel | keq = k1 + k2 + … + kn | [VB-TB p.2] |
| Hollow shaft under torsion (l = length, D = outer diameter, d = inner diameter) | keq = πG(D⁴ − d⁴)/(32 l) | [VB-TB p.2] |
| Case | ceq |
|---|---|
| Relative motion between parallel surfaces separated by a fluid of viscosity μ, gap h (A = area of the smaller plate) | μA/h |
| Dashpot (axial motion of a piston of diameter D, length l, clearance d in a cylinder) | μ · (3πD³ l)/(4d³) · (1 + 2d/D) |
| Torsional damper (diameter D, length l, gaps d and h) | πμD²(l − h)/(2d) + πμD³/(32h) |
| Dry friction (Coulomb damping; fN = friction force, ω = frequency, X = amplitude of vibration) | 4 fN/(π ω X) |
Columns as printed: length or area with centroid location C, and area moment of inertia (filled only for some shapes). r = radius.
| Shape | Length / area | Centroid | Area moment of inertia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Circular arc segment (half-angle θ) | L = 2θr | r sinθ/θ from the centre, on the x-axis | (not given) |
| Circular sector area | A = θr² | (2/3) r sinθ/θ from the centre | Ix = (1/4) r⁴ (θ − ½ sin 2θ); Iy = (1/4) r⁴ (θ + ½ sin 2θ) |
| Quarter and semicircle arcs | L = (π/2) r (quarter); L = πr (semicircle) | 2r/π (as shown) | (not given) |
| Quarter circle area | A = ¼ π r² | 4r/(3π) from each straight edge | Ix = Iy = (1/16) π r⁴ |
| Trapezoidal area (parallel sides a, b; height h) | A = ½ h (a + b) | (1/3) [(2a + b)/(a + b)] h | (not given) |
| Semicircular area | A = π r²/2 | 4r/(3π) | Ix = Iy = (1/8) π r⁴ |
| Semiparabolic area | A = (2/3) a b | (3/8) b and (3/5) a | (not given) |
| Circular area | A = π r² | at the centre | Ix = Iy = (1/4) π r⁴ |
| Exparabolic area | A = (1/3) a b | (3/4) a and (3/10) b | (not given) |
| Rectangular area (b × h) | A = b h | at the centre | Ix = (1/12) b h³; Iy = (1/12) h b³ |
| Parabolic area | A = (4/3) a b | (2/5) a | (not given) |
| Triangular area (base b, height h) | A = ½ b h | h/3 from the base | Ix = (1/36) b h³ |
| Solid | Volume / position of G | Mass moments of inertia |
|---|---|---|
| Sphere (radius r) | V = (4/3) π r³ | Ixx = Iyy = Izz = (2/5) m r² |
| Hemisphere | V = (2/3) π r³; G at (3/8) r from the flat face | Ixx = Iyy = 0.259 m r²; Izz = (2/5) m r² |
| Thin circular disk | (not given) | Ixx = Iyy = (1/4) m r²; Izz = (1/2) m r²; Iz'z' = (3/2) m r² (z' = axis at the rim) |
| Thin ring | (not given) | Ixx = Iyy = (1/2) m r²; Izz = m r² |
| Cylinder (radius r, height h) | V = π r² h | Ixx = Iyy = (1/12) m (3r² + h²); Izz = (1/2) m r² |
| Cone (radius r, height h) | V = (1/3) π r² h; G at h/4 from the base | Ixx = Iyy = (3/80) m (4r² + h²); Izz = (3/10) m r² |
| Thin plate (sides a, b) | (not given) | Ixx = (1/12) m b²; Iyy = (1/12) m a²; Izz = (1/12) m (a² + b²) |
| Slender rod (length l) | (not given) | Ixx = Iyy = (1/12) m l²; Ix'x' = Iy'y' = (1/3) m l²; Iz'z' = 0 |
Trigonometry:
Constants, logarithms, exponentials, hyperbolic functions and calculus:
Complex algebra [VB-TB p.7]:
| Material | Young's modulus E | Modulus of rigidity G | Poisson's ratio ν (printed "Ration") | Specific weight ρw |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steel (carbon steel) | 207 GPa | 79.3 GPa | 0.292 | 76.5 kN/m³ |
| Aluminum (aluminum alloys) | 71 GPa | 26.2 GPa | 0.334 | 26.6 kN/m³ |
| Brass | 106 GPa | 40 GPa | 0.324 | 83.8 kN/m³ |
| Copper | 119 GPa | 44.7 GPa | 0.326 | 87.3 kN/m³ |
| System | ω1², ω2² | Ratio r | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| m, m with K, K, K (wall to wall) | 3K/m, K/m | X2/X1 = −1, +1 | [VC-S8 pp.17–18; VC-R2D pp.27–29] |
| m, m with K, K, K (printed with (4 ± 2)/1) ⚠ C-F46 | 6K/m, 2K/m | X2/X1 = −4, 0 | [VC-R2D pp.16–18] |
| m1 = m2 = m, K1 = K2 = K free–chain (one spring to wall, one between) | ((3 + √5)/2)K/m, ((3 − √5)/2)K/m | X2/X1 = −1.62, 0.62 | [VC-R2D pp.39–41; VC-A2 pp.2–3] |
| Double pendulum, m1 = m2, L1 = L2 | (2 ± √2)g/L | X2/X1 = −0.4142, 2.4142 | [VC-S8 pp.24–25] |
| J1 = J0, J2 = 2J0, Kt1 = Kt2 = Kt ⚠ C-F45 | 2.37 Kt/J0, 0.634 Kt/J0 (printed) | θ2/θ1 = −0.37, 1.363 (printed) | [VC-R2D pp.10–12] |
| M = 20 kg, m = 5 kg pendulum, K = 1000 N/m, a = 0.5 m, L = 1 m | 105.25, 4.75 rad²/s² | θ/x = −2.21, 1.81 | [VC-R2D pp.44–45] |
| Rod on three springs (m = 5 kg, L = 0.8 m, K = 200 kN/m) ⚠ C-F50 | 160 000, 56 000 rad²/s² | θ/x = 2.5, −4 | [VC-R2D pp.48–50] |
A-F1 [VA-CH p.11] The simple pendulum is given as the example of a linear system, but the same book calls the pendulum equation non-linear because of sin θ and linearises it only for small θ [VA-CH p.42]. The "simple beam" given as a non-linear example is also doubtful.
A-F2 [VA-CH p.11] The third classification (deterministic vs non-deterministic excitation) repeats the heading "According to the mathematical modeling"; it is a classification by excitation.
A-F3 [VA-L1 p.3] sin nθ cos mθ is written as ½[sin(n+m)θ cos(n−m)θ]; the lecture's own later use [VA-L1 p.6] is sin A cos B = ½[sin(A+B) + sin(A−B)]. The e^(iθ) series has (iθ)³/5! where 3! is expected.
A-F4 [VA-CH p.18, 31] The coefficient formulas are swapped: an is printed with sin ωt and bn with cos ωt, and the n is missing (it should be an ↔ cos nωt, bn ↔ sin nωt). The worked examples on p.20 and p.22 repeat the swapped labels in their first line but then integrate the correct functions; p.26 uses the correct pairing. In the book form x = a0 + Σ…, a0 = (1/τ)∫x dt, whereas the lecture uses x = a0/2 + Σ… with a0 = (2/τ)∫x dt — both are consistent but differ by the factor ½ in a0.
A-F5 [VA-CH p.25–27] Falling sawtooth: the function is first written (A/τ)(τ − t) (= −(A/τ)t + A) and then "(2A/τ)(−t + τ)" (factor 2 inconsistent). bn = A/(nπ) is positive, but the final series is printed with a minus sign, "A/2 − (A/π)[sin nωt + ½ sin 2ωt + …]"; from the derived bn it should be A/2 + (A/π)[sin ωt + ½ sin 2ωt + ⅓ sin 3ωt + …] (the first term "sin nωt" should also read sin ωt). The line "x = a0 + Σ bn cos nωt" should read sin nωt.
A-F6 [VA-CH p.29] In the stiffness table the drawings and remarks for parallel and series springs are swapped: the row "Parallel spring, K = K1 + K2" shows springs end to end (series) with the remark "equivalent resistance in series", and the row "Series springs, 1/K = 1/K1 + 1/K2" shows springs side by side. The formulas themselves agree with the lecture [VA-L1 p.15]. The helical-spring figure labels 2R while the formula uses D. The printed "E = σ/E" should be E = σ/ε. The torsional (spiral) spring K = EI/L is kept as printed.
A-F7 [VA-L1 p.12] The symbol J is used both for the polar mass moment of inertia of the rotor and for the polar area moment of the shaft (kt = JG/L, J = πd⁴/32); the book writes k = GIp/L [VA-CH p.29, 43] to avoid the clash.
A-F8 [VA-CH p.40] "ẍ + ωn x = 0" is missing the square: it should be ẍ + ωn² x = 0 (as the book writes elsewhere, e.g. p.42 θ̈ + ωn²θ = 0).
A-F9 [VA-CH p.45] "K² = L³/3" for a rod is dimensionally inconsistent (k² must have units of length²); the value intended is not stated in the source.
A-F10 [VA-CH p.51] Preloaded springs on a disc: the torque −2krx with x = rθ is −2kr²θ, but it is printed "−2krθ²", and ωn = √(2Kr/J0) should then be √(2Kr²/J0) (dimension check: 2Kr/J0 is not s⁻²).
A-F11 [VA-CH p.58] The problem says "shell of hemisphere" but uses rc = 2R/π, and the final ωn = √(g/((π − 2)R)) is reached without showing how Ic was eliminated. The result is consistent with a thin semicircular ring (Ic = mR² − m rc²), not with a hemispherical shell; the source does not state the value of Ic it used.
A-F12 [VA-CH p.67] ζ = δ/√((2π)² − δ²) (minus sign) is inconsistent with δ = 2πζ/√(1 − ζ²), which inverts to ζ = δ/√((2π)² + δ²). The worked example on p.71 uses the same formula; with δ = 0.020 both give 0.003215.
A-F13 [VA-CH p.68] The critical-damping example first writes K = 0.7 N/cm and then K = 7.0 N/cm = 700 N/m, and leaves the answer blank; 2√(700 × 0.907) = 50.4 N·s/m (see checks). The dashpot example (p.69) asks for ζ but computes only c.
A-F14 [VA-CH p.70–71] "ωn = 27.784 K" (a stray K; unit rad/s); δ = ln(1/0.92) is printed where the data give 1/0.98 (the value 0.020 matches 0.98); c = 2ζmωn = 0.545 is wrong — 2 × 0.003215 × 2.267 × 27.78 = 0.405 N·s/m.
A-F15 [VA-CH p.71–72] The data C = 70.0 N·s/cm are rewritten as C = 0.7 N/(cm/s) (a factor-of-100 change), K = 70 N/cm is substituted as 7 × 100 N/m (it should be 7000 N/m), and m = 17.5 kg becomes 17.9 in ωn. The answers (b)–(d) are blank. With the stated data (C = 7000 N·s/m, K = 7000 N/m) ζ = 10 (overdamped, no ωd); the source's own substitution gives 0.316. The intended data are unclear.
A-F16 [VA-CH p.74] From ma²θ̈ + Ca²θ̇ + KL²θ = 0 (the damper at a, the spring at L) the mass term should be mL²θ̈ if m is at L as drawn. The source divides by ma² and writes C/m, which is consistent with its own first line but not with the figure.
A-F17 [VA-CH p.76] Gun barrel: B = e × 20 × 1.25 = 67.96 m/s, but it is printed "62 m/s", and part (c) then uses 68. Part (c) writes "1 = 68 e^(−20t)" without the factor t (x = Bt e^(−ωn t)) and is left unsolved. Correct: 1 = 67.96 t e^(−20t) → t = 0.0236 s on the outward recoil (and 0.0912 s on the return).
A-F18 [VA-L2 p.20] Composite shaft: (kt)st and (kt)Al are both written "× 10⁵", but their sum is given as 5.54811 × 10⁶. The correct values are (kt)st = 5.3407 × 10⁶ and (kt)Al = 0.2074 × 10⁶ N·m/rad; the final Keq = 5.548 × 10⁶ N·m/rad is correct.
A-F19 [VA-L2 p.27] Case (2) of the root solutions is written x = e^(at)(C1 cos D1t + C2 sin D2t); for roots a ± ib it should read e^(at)(C1 cos bt + C2 sin bt) (the lecturer marked "b" above D1 and D2).
A-F20 [VA-L2 p.31] ẏ² is written with the denominator 4L⁵; it should be 4L⁶ (the next line uses 8L⁶ correctly, and the result 0.2357 mL is correct).
A-F21 [VA-LP p.2–3] Ex. 1: with the given data C2 = (ẋ0 + ζωn x0)/ωd = 0.0000 exactly (the data were chosen so that it vanishes), not "0.009". For ζ = 1 the coefficient of t is ẋ0 + ωn x0 = 0.2192 m/s (printed "2.4744"). For ζ = 1.7 the sinh coefficient is (ẋ0 + ζωn x0)/ω′d = 0.00916 (printed "0.098"). τd is computed with ωn (2π/31.32 = 0.2006 s) instead of ωd (2π/31.074 = 0.2022 s) — negligible here.
A-F22 [VA-LP p.6] Ex. 2: "e^(−√5 t) = 0 → t = 318.31 s" is meaningless (the exponential is never zero; the root is t → ∞). The rest is correct (t = 0.2704 s, xmax = 1.2215 m).
A-F23 [VA-LP p.8–9] Ex. 3: X̄d = √(C1² + C2²) = √(0.05² + 0.01277²) = 0.0516 m, not 0.05; ζωn = 6.13 is correct. Only the case with x0 = 0.05, ẋ0 = 0 is solved by hand (the critical and over-damped cases and the ẋ0 effect appear only in the typed figure). The source does not state how x0 and ẋ0 follow from the step and the 5 m/s speed.
A-F24 [VA-LP p.15] Ex. 5: from tan ωd t = 2.26676 the time is t = 1.15532/ωd = 1.15532/π = 0.3677 s, but the source divides by ωn (3.433) → 0.3365 s; in the next line it uses ωn instead of ωd in the amplitude and the sine, and drops t from the exponent (e^(−1.385)). The answer 3.747 m/s is crossed out. Recomputed: ẋ0 = 0.25ωd/(e^(−ζωn t) sin ωd t) = 1.429 m/s.
A-F25 [VA-BK p.87] The line that substitutes x_p.I into the equation of motion is printed as scrambled text ("t ω sin ₀) = Fϕ -t ω sin ( X) + …"); the intended step is −mω²X sin(ωt − φ) + CωX cos(ωt − φ) + KX sin(ωt − φ) = F0 sin ωt, which the force polygon then solves.
A-F26 [VA-BK p.88] For ζ = 0 and ω/ωn > 1 the phase is printed "φ = 1"; it should be φ = 180° (π), as the same page gives φ = 0°, 180° and the phase figure shows a jump to π.
A-F27 [VA-BK p.90] Resonant-amplitude example: the statement gives X_res = 1.5 cm but the solution uses 1.25 cm (with 1.25 cm ζ = 0.49698 as printed; with 1.5 cm ζ = 0.414 and C = 52.0). ζ is printed as "0.25sec" in the data line. C = 2mωnζ = 2 × 2 × 31.416 × 0.497 = 62.45 N·s/m (the source writes N·s/cm).
A-F28 [VA-BK p.90–91] Example with k = 0.54 kN/m: the statement gives period 1.8 s and force F(t) = 2 cos 3t, but the solution first writes τd = 1.2 s (then uses 1.8 s), the ratio as 4.2/10 (statement 4.2 to 1.0), and solves with F = 9 sin 3t (F0 = 9), x(t) = X cos(ωt − φ). Printed typos: "ωn = 3.58 sec", "K = 540 N/m²" and "3/358", "3/3.52" in the X and φ lines. With the solution's own values (ζ = 0.2227, ωn = 3.58, F0 = 9) X = 0.0349 m and φ = 51.4° (source 51.54°); with F0 = 2 as stated X = 7.76 mm. The mass is never given, so K = mωn² = 540 is really the given stiffness (it would imply m = 42.1 kg).
A-F29 [VA-BK p.94–95] Grinding machine: the data line is garbled ("ζ = 0.33m = 0.2 Kg", read as τ = 0.33 s, m = 0.2 kg). ωd = 2π/0.33 = 19.04 rad/s, so ωn = ωd/0.99 = 19.23 rad/s, but the source calls 19.05 the ωn (it is ωd) and gets K = 23.589 kN/m; with ωn = 19.23, K = 24.04 kN/m (8.01 kN/m per spring). The amplitude is 0.0508 cm (0.5 mm) for e = 0.05 m; the source prints X = 0.5 cm (factor 10, or unit slip).
A-F30 [VA-BK p.95] Motor on a table: the statement gives e = 15 mm and δst = 3 mm, the solution lists e = 15 cm and δst = 3 cm but still uses 0.003 m in ωn. With e = 15 mm, X = 6.10 mm (0.61 cm); "6.09 cm" is 10 times too large unless e is 15 cm. The statement does not give the speed 875 rev/min used in the solution; ln(X1/Xn+1) = ζωn(nτd) is used with nτd = 1 s.
A-F31 [VA-BK p.103] r/e is printed with (ω/ω)² in the numerator (the n subscript is lost). Also, "F_s in the direction SO" while r is defined as OS; only the magnitude matters.
A-F32 [VA-BK p.104] For ω/ωn > 1 the source says S lies "between O, S"; a point cannot lie between itself and another. As r/e becomes negative, G (not S) should be the point that lies between O and S — the source does not say. Also the ζ = 0, φ = 0 statement on p.103 is only valid below resonance (φ = 180° above it).
A-F33 [VA-BK p.105] Turbine wheel: the printed final line uses "πd²/64" (should be πd⁴/64). Recomputed: r = 0.174 mm, Kr = 2588 N, Mb = KrL/4 = 194 N·m, σb = 194 × 0.015/3.976 × 10⁻⁸ = 73.2 N/mm²; the source gets 142 N/mm² (almost twice). The other steps (K, ωn, ω, r/e) check.
A-F34 [VA-BK p.106] Turbocharger: ωn = √(K/M) with K = 3.02 × 10⁶ N/m, M = 10 kg is 549.5 rad/s, not "459.5" (Ncr = 5247.8 rev/min and r/e = 0.8 are consistent with 549.5). F/bearing = Kr/2 = 3.02 × 10⁶ × 0.012 × 10⁻³/2 = 18.1 N, printed "18.14 KN" (unit). Part (c) at 500 rev/min is not worked (r/e = 0.00916, r = 0.137 µm, F = 0.21 N).
A-F35 [VA-BK p.107] Gas turbine: the statement gives E = 2 × 10¹⁰ N/m² but the solution uses 21 × 10¹⁰ (with E = 2 × 10¹⁰, K = 3.5 × 10⁵ N/m). K = 3.673 × 10⁶ is printed; recomputed 3.693 × 10⁶ (ωn = 549.5). r = 0.8 × 0.025 mm = 0.02 mm, but "0.02 cm" and "0.002 cm" are printed (0.002 cm = 0.02 mm is the second value, so the first is a slip). With r_res/e = ωn t/2 (this relation is not derived in the source) and r_res/e = 0.8, t = 1.6/549.4 = 2.91 × 10⁻³ s, not 2.91 × 10⁻⁴ s. The maximum bearing force asked in (b) is not computed.
A-F36 [VA-BK p.108] Shaft with a third bearing: the statement gives a 25 cm diameter and 750 cm span, the solution uses D = 0.25 m, L = 0.75 m, but Ks = 48EI/L³ = 4.58 × 10⁵ N/m (so that Keq = 6.98 × 10⁵) needs d = 0.025 m; with d = 0.25 m, Ks = 4.58 × 10⁹. M = "1.0/9.21" kg is 100/9.81 = 10.19 kg (the printed ωn = 261.6 and ζ = 0.206 use 10.19). r = 0.147 × 0.0025 = 3.67 × 10⁻⁴ m, printed "0.037 m"; F(bearing) = Ks r/2 = 84.1 N, printed 8.48 N; F(III) is not evaluated (≈ 96 N). The unsafe-range answer ω1 = 300.9, ω2 = 227 (rad/s) cannot be reproduced: r = 5 × 10⁻⁴ m needs r/e = 0.2, and for ζ = 0.206 this happens only at ω/ωn = 0.412 (ω = 107.8 rad/s = 1029 rev/min); above it r/e stays greater than 0.2 for all speeds (900 rev/min is below it, safe).
A-F37 [VA-BK p.97–98] Corrugated-road example: the statement gives k = 4000 N/m, but the solution uses K = 40 kN/m. With 40 kN/m the answers X = 0.4 m and Vcr = 40 m/s check (0.407 m, 40.26 m/s); with 4000 N/m, ωn = 4 rad/s, Vcr = 12.7 m/s and X = 0.107 m. The stated ζ = 0.20 is ignored ("in the case of no damping"); with ζ = 0.2 and K = 40 kN/m, X = 0.389 m. The road wave is drawn as y = Y sin(2πx/L).
A-F38 [VA-BK p.109] The book writes y for the seismic-mass displacement and x for the container, while the figure labels the base motion y = A sin ωt; the derived relative-motion equation and Z/X are consistent with z = y − x only if y is the mass and x the base, as the text states.
A-F39 [VA-BK p.112–113] Vibrometer example: the result ω/ωn = 0.728 (from r² = 0.53; the quartic gives r² = 0.5364 as its positive root, r = 0.7324) is the point where M.F first rises to 0.95, on the rising branch before resonance; for ζ = 0.22 M.F then passes through a peak of 2.33 and comes back within 5% of 1 (M.F ≤ 1.05) only for ω/ωn ≥ 4.34. The formula e% = 100(1 − M.F) also ignores M.F > 1 (negative error). The mass and stiffness given (2.5 kg, 60 N/m; ωn = 4.9 rad/s) are not used. The printed square root is √(16.71² + 4 × 9.25) = 17.78 (printed 17.71 in the numerator line).
A-F40 [VA-BK p.113] Second vibrometer example: "e% = (1 + MF) × 100" is written where (1 − MF) × 100 is meant (the next line uses 1 − MF) and the solution stops after M.F = 0.98. Recomputed (ζ = 0.6): M.F = 0.98 at ω/ωn = 1.264 (6.32 Hz); M.F stays within ±2% only for ω/ωn ≥ 3.51 (17.6 Hz), because M.F exceeds 1.02 between 1.445 and 3.51.
A-F41 [VA-BK p.114] Motor-mounted vibrometer: the statement gives 1.5 mm, the solution writes 1.5 and then "X = −55 × 0.5/64 cm = 1.289 cm" (0.5 for 1.5 and cm for mm). Correct: X = 1.5 × 55/64 = 1.289 mm (the negative sign means the motion is opposite in phase to the mass motion).
A-F42 [VA-BK p.115] "x0 =" is left blank for the constant term; it should be a0/k.
A-F43 [VA-BK p.117–119] Relay example: tan φ1 is printed with a square root, tan φ1 = 2ζ(ω/ωn)/√(1 − (ω/ωn)²)²; it should be 2ζ(ω/ωn)/(1 − (ω/ωn)²). The Y3 formula keeps 2ζ(ω/ωn) instead of 2ζ(3ω/ωn) in its second term, and its phase is written φ1 with 3ω/ωn in the denominator (a separate φ3 with 3ω is meant). The step "−4a/(iω · 2π/ω) = −2a/(πi)" is printed with "π^i" for πi.
A-F44 [VA-BK p.123–126] Second cam function: the input is written −(A/τ)t + A and then "(2A/τ)(−t + τ)" (same factor-2 slip as ⚠ A-F5). Here the derived bn = A/(nπ) is carried through with a plus sign, x(t) = A/2 + (A/π)[sin ωt + ½ sin 2ωt + …], which confirms the sign correction proposed in ⚠ A-F5. In the first function the intermediate line (4A/τ²n²ω²)(2 cos nω(τ/2) − 1 − cos nωτ) is correct; the response uses undamped k_eq y = k_eq x, so φn = 0 is valid only for n ω < ωn (φ = π above).
A-F45 [VA-BK p.128] ∫ F(t) δ(t − ζ) dt is printed "= F/ζ"; the sifting property gives F(ζ), the value of F at t = ζ.
A-F46 [VA-BK p.129] The ζ < 1 impulse response is first written x = X e^(ζωn t) sin(ωd t + φ) with a positive exponent; the next line and the following pages use e^(−ζωn t).
A-F47 [VA-BK p.135] The half-sine response is printed x(t) = (F0/k)[sin ωt + (ω/ωn) sin ωn t]/(1 − (ω/ωn)²). The preceding line (−2ωn sin ωt + 2ω sin ωn t) gives a minus sign: x(t) = (F0/k)[sin ωt − (ω/ωn) sin ωn t]/(1 − (ω/ωn)²), which also matches the printed derivative (cos ωt − cos ωn t) on p.135.
A-F48 [VA-BK p.137] The bound i < ½(1 + ωn/ω) with ω/ωn = ½ (ωn/ω = 2) equals 3/2, not "½(1 + ½) < 3/4"; only i = 1 satisfies it, so tm = 2π/(ω + ωn) = 4π/(3ωn) (0.667 of the natural period), and the peak is x = (F0/K) sin(2π/3)/(1 − ½) = 1.732 F0/K (computed here; the source stops at tm). The source also equates the pulse length T with the natural period (ω = π/T, ωn = 2π/T) without saying so in the problem statement, and uses T for both the pulse length and the period (T = 1/f).
A-F49 [VA-BK p.144–166] The section headings of Ch. 5 are numbered 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 … (the numbering of Ch. 4 is repeated), and the contents pages list Ch. 5 as the 2-DOF chapter; the source's "4.1 Introduction" of Ch. 4 (PDF p.84) is also an empty heading.
A-F50 [VA-BK p.151] Matrix form of the disc–pendulum example: the mass matrix is printed with (2/3)M + m, whereas the equation (1) and the kinetic energy T = ½(3/2 M)ẋ² + … give (3/2)M + m.
A-F51 [VA-BK p.161] The independent equations are printed q̈i + ωni qi = 0 (missing the square); they should be q̈i + ωni² qi = 0. Also p.156: μ = (−ωn m + 2k)/k lacks the square on ωn.
A-F52 [VA-BK p.164–165] The beat sum is printed "cos ω2 + cos ω1 = 2 cos((ω2 − ω1)/2) cos((ω2 + ω1)/2)" without t; and ωB = (ω2 − ω1)/2 is called "the beat frequency" with period T = 2π/ωB, but the envelope |cos ωB t| repeats (successive amplitude maxima) every π/ωB; 2π/ωB is the period of the modulating cosine itself. The source keeps the two sign conventions (ω1 ≅ ω2) without giving numbers.
A-F53 [VA-BK p.168] The first line of θ2(t) is printed "½θ0 cos ωn1 t + ½θ0 cos ωn2 t"; from the previous page (½θ0[cos ωn1 t − cos ωn2 t]) and the sin·sin result it should be a minus sign.
A-F54 [VA-BK p.175] In the quadratic for the absorber frequencies b is printed −[1 + (1 − μ)(ω22/ω11)²], but the rearranged equation just above has (1 + μ); the first root is printed x1 = −(ωn1/ω22)² (a minus sign that has no meaning for the product/sum relations used next, x1x2 = c/a = (ω11/ω22)²).
A-F55 [VA-BK p.177–178] Beam and motor example: the statement gives a 1 cm deflection under 1200 N (k = 120 000 N/m, which is the value used); the solution writes "δ = 1 mm = .001 m" and "k = 1200/.001 = 120000", which would be 1.2 × 10⁶ N/m. With k = 120 000 the source's numbers check (ωn = 49 rad/s, F0 = 369 N, k2 = 2305 N/m, X2 = 0.16 m).
A-F56 [VA-BK p.179–180] Refrigeration example: the trial-test part and the final M2, k2 are left blank. Recomputed: ω22 = ωn1ωn2/ω11 = 198 × 272/232 = 232.1 rev/min; μ = (198² + 272²)/ω22² − (232/232.1)² − 1 = 0.1016; M1 = 1/μ = 9.84 kg; k1 = M1ω11² = 5808 N/m. Design: ωn2 = 232²/160 = 336.4 rev/min (printed 336); μ = (160/232)² + (336.4/232)² − 2 = 0.578 (printed 0.577; 0.573 with 336); M2 = μM1 = 5.69 kg; k2 = M2ω22² = 3358 N/m. These are computed here, not from the source.
A-F57 [VA-BK p.181–182] Pump example: "M2 = 204.8 kg" is printed after μ = 0.0977 = M2/M1 with M2 = 20 kg given; 204.8 kg is M1 (= 20/0.0977), the equivalent mass asked for. Recomputed μ = 0.0974 (M1 = 205.3 kg) using ω22 = 50 × 68/59.33 = 57.30. The frequencies are called "HZ" while ω = 2 × 1780/60 = 59.33 is a frequency in Hz (the pulsation frequency of a double-acting pump, twice the speed); k2 = ω22²M2 is not evaluated (with ω22 in rad/s, 2.59 × 10⁶ N/m).
A-F58 [VA-BK p.140–141] Car on a rough road: the statement gives the road amplitude as 10 cm but the figure marks 0.02 m; the damping "coefficient 0.2" is the damping ratio ξ = ζ.
A-F59 [VA-BK p.138–139, 180] Problems: (i) the first bar problem gives I_o = m l² whereas the second copy of the same system gives I_O = ⅓mL² (the uniform-bar value); (ii) the amplification factor is written X/F_O = 2.5 (X/X0 is meant) and the first copy says ω = 35 Hz while the second says 35 rad/s (the symbols are partly garbled in the print); (iii) the seismograph matrix is printed [[k, −ka],[−ka, mgLa²k]], which is dimensionally inconsistent (the θθ term should combine ka² with mgL); (iv) I0 = mL² is given for a uniform rod, the uniform-rod value being ⅓mL².
| Example | Source answer | Recomputed (Python) | ✓/✗ |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHM A = 1 m, τ = 2 s [VA-CH p.17] | ẋmax 3.14 m/s, ẍmax 9.86 m/s² | 3.1416, 9.8696 | ✓ |
| Torsional pendulum [VA-CH p.44] | J = 0.567 kg·m² | K = 2.454 N·m/rad, ωn = 2.0805 rad/s, J = 0.5670 | ✓ |
| Compound pendulum ωn,max [VA-CH p.46] | (1/2)^(1/4)√(g/r) | 0.8409√(g/r), h = r/√2 | ✓ |
| cc for 0.907 kg, 700 N/m [VA-CH p.68] | blank | 50.39 N·s/m | ✗ (missing) |
| Dashpot [VA-CH p.69] | c = 1/2.4 lb·s/in | 0.4167 lb·s/in | ✓ |
| 2.267 kg, 17.5 N/cm, ratio 1/0.98 [VA-CH p.70–71] | ωn 27.784, δ 0.020, ζ 0.003215, c 0.545, ωd 27.78 | 27.784 rad/s, 0.0202, 0.003215, 0.405 N·s/m, 27.784 | ✗ (c) |
| 4.534 kg, 35 N/cm, 0.1243 N·s/cm [VA-CH p.71] | ζ 0.049, δ 0.3, ratio 1.34 | 0.0493, 0.3104, 1.364 (1.35 with δ rounded to 0.3) | ✓ (rounding) |
| 17.5 kg example [VA-CH p.71–72] | blank | depends on the unclear data (⚠ A-F15) | — |
| Railway buffer [VA-CH p.72–73] | ζ 1.017, ωn 0.799, t 1.25 s, xmax 0.6998 m | 1.0170, 0.7994, 1.251 s, 0.6995 m | ✓ |
| Gun barrel [VA-CH p.75–76] | Cc 2 × 10⁴, ωn 20, B 62 m/s, (c) blank | 2.0 × 10⁴ N·s/m, 20 rad/s, B = 67.96 m/s, t(1 m) = 0.0236 s | ✗ (B, c) |
| Half-sine Fourier series [VA-L1 p.6–8] | a0/2 = A/π, b1 = A/2, a2 = −2A/3π, a4 = −2A/15π | same from 2A/(π(1+n)(1−n)) | ✓ |
| Composite shaft [VA-L2 p.20] | (kt)st 5.34072 × 10⁵, (kt)Al 0.207395 × 10⁵, Keq 5.54811 × 10⁶ N·m/rad | 5.3407 × 10⁶, 0.20739 × 10⁶, 5.5481 × 10⁶ | ✗ (exponents of the parts) / ✓ (Keq) |
| Cantilever effective mass [VA-L2 p.31] | 0.11786 mL ẏ², Meq = 0.2357 mL | 0.117857, 0.235714 | ✓ |
| Spring–mass k/m = 4, x0 = 2 cm, v0 = 8 cm/s up [VA-L2 p.32, 34] | X̄ 4.472 cm, α 63.435°, t 1.01722 s, ẍmax 0.1789 m/s² | 0.044721 m, 63.435°, 1.01722 s, 0.17889 m/s² | ✓ |
| LP Ex. 1 machine [VA-LP p.2–3] | ωn 31.32, ζ 0.12528, ωd 31.073, C2 ≈ 0; ζ=1 coef 2.4744; ζ=1.7 coef 0.098, ω′d 43.057 | 31.321, 0.125284, 31.074, C2 = 0.0000; 0.2192; 0.00916, 43.059 | ✓ / ✗ (coefficients) |
| LP Ex. 1 (c) damping values [VA-LP p.1] | 3192.754, 5427.6818 N·s/m | cc = 3192.754, 1.7cc = 5427.682 | ✓ |
| LP Ex. 2 locomotive [VA-LP p.5–6] | ωn 4.47, ζ 0.5, ωd 3.8729, X̄d 2.58, τd 1.6223 s, t 0.27 s, xmax 1.22 m | 4.4721, 0.5000, 3.8730, 2.5820, 1.6223 s, 0.2704 s, 1.2215 m | ✓ |
| LP Ex. 2 (c) (not solved in source) | — | ζ = 1: t = 0.2236 s, xmax = 0.8226 m; ζ = 2: t = 0.1700 s, xmax = 0.4887 m | — |
| LP Ex. 3 bicycle case 1 [VA-LP p.8–9] | ωn 24.76, ζ 0.2476, ωd 23.989, C2 0.01277, X̄d 0.05, φ −0.25 | 24.761, 0.24761, 23.990, 0.012779, 0.0516, −0.2502; cc = 4038.55 | ✓ / ✗ (X̄d) |
| LP Ex. 4 two masses [VA-LP p.11–12] | δ 0.7675, ζ 0.121254, J0 0.001008, ωn 32.726, k 1199.56 N/m | 0.76753, 0.121255, 0.001008, 32.727, 1199.56 | ✓ |
| LP Ex. 5 shock absorber [VA-LP p.14–15] | δ 2.7726, ζ 0.4037, ωn 3.433, c 554.36, k 2358, t 0.3365 s, ẋ0 3.747 (crossed out) | 2.77259, 0.40371, 3.4339, 554.52, 2358.3, t = 0.3677 s, ẋ0 = 1.429 m/s | ✓ / ✗ (t, ẋ0) |
| LP Ex. 6 cannon [VA-LP p.17] | cc 4472.136, ẋ0 4.8626 m/s, t(0.1 m) 0.825 s | 4472.136, 4.8626, 0.8257 s (also 0.0228 s on the outward stroke) | ✓ |
| Forced-vibration example A: X_res = 1.25 cm [VA-BK p.90] | ζ 0.49698, C = 62.45 "N·s/cm" | 0.49698, 62.45 N·s/m (0.414 and 52.0 for 1.5 cm) | ✓ (unit ✗) |
| Example B, k = 0.54 kN/m [VA-BK p.90–91] | ζ 0.223, ωn 3.58, X 34.9 mm, φ 51.54° | 0.2227, 3.5805, 34.91 mm, 51.41° (rounding of ζ, ωn); X = 7.76 mm with F0 = 2 | ✓ (statement mismatch ⚠ A-F28) |
| Grinding machine [VA-BK p.94] | δ 0.8959, ζ 0.14, ωd/ωn 0.99, ωn 19.05, K 23.589 kN/m, spring 7.862 kN/m, X 0.5 cm | 0.8959, 0.1412, 0.9900, 19.23, 24.04, 8.01 kN/m, 0.0508 cm | ✓ (δ, ζ, ratio) / ✗ |
| Motor on table [VA-BK p.95] | ωn 57.19, ζ 0.06, ω 91.629, X 6.09 cm | 57.18, 0.0606, 91.630, X = 6.10 mm (0.610 cm) | ✓ / ✗ (unit) |
| Corrugated road, K = 40 kN/m [VA-BK p.97–98] | ω 7.8, X 0.4 m, Vcr 40 m/s | 7.854, 0.407 m, 40.26 m/s (12.7 m/s and 0.107 m with 4000 N/m) | ✓ (⚠ A-F37) |
| Turbine wheel [VA-BK p.105] | K 1.483 × 10⁷, ωn 741, ω 377, r 0.174 mm, σ 142 N/mm² | 1.484 × 10⁷, 741.5, 377.0, 0.1743 mm, 73.2 N/mm² | ✓ / ✗ (σ) |
| Turbocharger [VA-BK p.106] | ωn 459.5, Ncr 5247.8, r/e 0.8, r 0.012 mm, F 18.14 kN | 549.5 rad/s, 5247.7 rev/min, 0.801, 0.01202 mm, 18.15 N (500 rev/min: 0.21 N) | ✗ (ωn, F unit) / ✓ |
| Gas turbine [VA-BK p.107] | K 3.673 × 10⁶, ωn 549.4, r 0.02 cm, t 2.91 × 10⁻⁴ s | 3.693 × 10⁶ (E = 21 × 10¹⁰), 549.45, 0.02 mm, 2.91 × 10⁻³ s | ✗ (r unit, t) / ✓ (ωn) |
| Shaft with third bearing (d = 25 mm) [VA-BK p.108] | Keq 6.98 × 10⁵, ωn 261.6, ζ 0.206, r/e 0.147, r 0.037 m, F 8.48 N, r_max 5 × 10⁻⁴ m, ω1 300.9, ω2 227 | 6.981 × 10⁵, 261.7, 0.2062, 0.1469, 3.67 × 10⁻⁴ m, 84.1 N, 5.00 × 10⁻⁴ m, ω = 107.8 rad/s only | ✓ (Keq, ωn, ζ, r/e, r_max) / ✗ |
| Vibrometer 1 (ζ = 0.22, 5 %) [VA-BK p.112–113] | 16.71, 9.25, r² 0.53, r 0.728 | 16.72, 9.256, 0.5364, 0.7324; error stays ≤ 5 % only for r ≥ 4.34 | ✓ (algebra) / ✗ (range) |
| Vibrometer 2 (ζ = 0.6, ±2 %) [VA-BK p.113] | blank | M.F = 0.98 at r = 1.264 (6.32 Hz); within ±2 % only for r ≥ 3.51 (17.6 Hz) | — |
| Vibrometer 3, 1600 rev/min [VA-BK p.114] | Z/X = 64/(−55), X 1.289 cm | −1.1636; X = 1.289 mm | ✓ / ✗ (unit) |
| Cam/relay Fourier coefficients [VA-BK p.117–125] | bi = 4a/πi; a0 = A/2, an = −4A/n²π²; sawtooth bn = A/nπ | 1.2732, 0.4244 (a = 1); 0.5, −0.4053, −0.0450; 0.3183, 0.1592, 0.1061 (A = 1) | ✓ |
| Step response damped [VA-BK p.134] | (F0/k)[1 − e^(−ζωn t)cos(ωd t − φ)/√(1 − ζ²)] | numerical ODE, max difference 5 × 10⁻¹¹ (ζ = 0.2) | ✓ |
| Half-sine pulse ω/ωn = ½ [VA-BK p.135–137] | printed "sin ωt + (ω/ωn) sin ωn t"; bound i < 3/4 | minus sign gives peak 1.732 F0/K at t = 2π/(ω + ωn); bound i < 3/2 | ✗ (⚠ A-F47, A-F48) |
| Two masses, three springs [VA-BK p.156] | ωn1 √(k/m), ωn2 √(3k/m), modes {1, 1}, {1, −1} | eigenvalues k/m and 3k/m; vectors (1, 1), (1, −1) | ✓ |
| Coupled pendulums [VA-BK p.167] | ωn1 √(g/L), ωn2 √(g/L + 2ka²/mL²) | m = L = 1, k = 3, a = 0.5: 3.132, 3.363 | ✓ |
| Beam + absorber [VA-BK p.178–179] | k 120 000, ωn 49, F0 370 N, k2 2305 N/m, X2 −0.16 m | 120 000 (1 cm), 48.99, 369.4, 2305.6, −0.1602 | ✓ (⚠ A-F55 for δ) |
| Refrigeration absorber [VA-BK p.180] | ωn2 336, μ 0.577 | 336.4, 0.578 (0.573 with 336); trial: ω22 = 232.1, μ = 0.1016, M1 = 9.84 kg; M2 = 5.69 kg, k2 = 3358 N/m | ✓ (rest blank in source) |
| Pump absorber [VA-BK p.181–182] | ω22 57.3, μ 0.0977, "M2" 204.8 kg | 57.30, 0.0974, M1 = 205.3 kg (204.7 with 0.0977) | ✓ (label ⚠ A-F57) |
Files in (grayscale JPEG, width ≤ 800 px).